医学
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
传统PCI
队列
内科学
弗雷明翰风险评分
心肌梗塞
外科
疾病
作者
Felice Gragnano,David van Klaveren,Dik Heg,Lorenz Räber,Mitchell W. Krucoff,Sergio Raposeiras‐Roubín,Jurriën M. ten Berg,Sergio Leonardi,Takeshi Kimura,Noé Corpataux,Alessandro Spirito,James Hermiller,Emad Abu‐Assi,Dean R.P.P. Chan Pin Yin,Jaouad Azzahhafi,Claudio Montalto,M Galazzi,Sarah Bär,Raminta Kavaliauskaite,Fabrizio D’Ascenzo
出处
期刊:Circulation
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2024-10-27
卷期号:151 (6): 343-355
被引量:71
标识
DOI:10.1161/circulationaha.124.072009
摘要
BACKGROUND: Accurate bleeding risk stratification after percutaneous coronary intervention is important for treatment individualization. However, there is still an unmet need for a more precise and standardized identification of patients at high bleeding risk. We derived and validated a novel bleeding risk score by augmenting the Predicting Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing Stent Implantation and Subsequent Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score with the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria. METHODS: <0.01). The discrimination of the score was internally assessed with apparent validation and cross-validation. The score was externally validated in 4578 patients from the MASTER DAPT trial (Management of High Bleeding Risk Patients Post Bioresorbable Polymer Coated Stent Implantation With an Abbreviated Versus Prolonged DAPT Regimen) and 5970 patients from the STOPDAPT-2 (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy-2) total cohort. RESULTS: =0.20) and other risk scores. In the derivation cohort, a cutoff of 23 points identified 11 414 patients (39.1%) with a 1-year BARC 3 or 5 bleeding risk ≥4%. An alternative version of the score, including acute myocardial infarction on admission instead of white blood cell count, showed similar predictive ability. CONCLUSIONS: The PRECISE-HBR score is a contemporary, simple 7-item risk score to predict bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention, offering a moderate improvement in discrimination over multiple existing scores. Further evaluation is required to assess its impact on clinical practice.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI