Exploring disparities in surgical recommendations for patients with primary intramedullary spinal cord tumors: an analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2000 to 2019

OBJECTIVE Factors that may drive recommendations for operative intervention for patients with intramedullary spinal cord tumors (ISCTs) have yet to be extensively studied. The authors investigated racial and socioeconomic disparities in the management of patients with primary spinal cord ependymomas and nonependymal gliomas, with the aim of determining the associations between socioeconomic patient characteristics, survival, and recommendations for the resection of primary ISCTs. METHODS The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry was queried to identify all patients > 18 years of age with ISCTs diagnosed between 2000 and 2019. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to calculate odds ratios for variables associated with receiving a surgical recommendation. Log-rank tests and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). RESULTS The authors identified 2325 patients (mean age 49 [SD 16] years; 48.8% female; 67.4% non-Hispanic White, 7.8% non-Hispanic Black, 16.2% Hispanic, 6.5% Asian/Pacific Islander, 0.6% Native American; 56.7% married; 64.4% with household income < $75,000; 73.8% with spinal ependymoma; and 26.2% with nonependymal spinal glioma). Eighty-seven percent of patients received a surgical recommendation. In multivariable models, marriage was associated with higher odds of receiving a surgical recommendation for ependymomas (OR 1.80, p = 0.005). In multivariable models for nonependymal spinal gliomas, older age (OR 0.98, p = 0.001) and increased number of tumors (OR 0.62, p = 0.015) were associated with decreased odds of receiving surgical recommendations. Among ependymomas, marriage (HR 0.59, p = 0.001), younger age (HR 0.93, p < 0.001), female sex (HR 0.43, p = 0.006), and decreased number of tumors (HR 0.56, p < 0.001) were associated with improved OS. Among nonependymal spinal gliomas, median household income ≥ $75,000 (HR 0.69, p = 0.020) and younger age (HR 0.98, p < 0.001) were associated with improved DSS, while Black race (HR 4.65, p = 0.027) and older age (HR 1.05, p < 0.001) were associated with worse OS. CONCLUSIONS In patients with spinal ependymomas and nonependymal spinal gliomas, recommendations for surgery appear to be unaffected by patient sex, race, or income. Survival disparities appear to exist among unmarried, male, Black, and lower-income cohorts. Continued initiatives to identify drivers of disparities while improving health equity in this patient population are needed.