清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

Letter by Chalmers Regarding Article “Nitinol Stent Implantation Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery and Proximal Popliteal Artery: Twelve-Month Results From the RESILIENT Randomized Trial”

医学 血管成形术 气球 支架 随机对照试验 外科 腘动脉 股动脉 经皮 股浅动脉 血运重建 放射科 心脏病学 心肌梗塞
作者
Nicholas Chalmers
出处
期刊:Circulation-cardiovascular Interventions [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:3 (5): e22; author reply e23-e22; author reply e23 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1161/circinterventions.110.958173
摘要

HomeCirculation: Cardiovascular InterventionsVol. 3, No. 5Letter by Chalmers Regarding Article "Nitinol Stent Implantation Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery and Proximal Popliteal Artery: Twelve-Month Results From the RESILIENT Randomized Trial" Free AccessLetterPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessLetterPDF/EPUBLetter by Chalmers Regarding Article "Nitinol Stent Implantation Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery and Proximal Popliteal Artery: Twelve-Month Results From the RESILIENT Randomized Trial" Nicholas Chalmers, MBChB, FRCR Nicholas ChalmersNicholas Chalmers Department of RadiologyManchester Royal InfirmaryManchester, United Kingdom (Chalmers) Originally published1 Oct 2010https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.958173Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2010;3:e22To the Editor:The authors of the RESILIENT trial1 have adopted a trial design that by their own admission is controversial. They have randomly assigned patients to either percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) or stent placement but have then analyzed the outcomes using different primary end points for each group. This is surely more than controversial: It is a travesty of scientific method.The authors have determined that all patients in the PTA arm of the trial who cross over to stent placement during the index procedure are classified as reaching the primary end point (and having target lesion revascularization), whereas those in the primary stent arm of the trial (who have undergone an identical procedure) are not. Thus, 40% of the PTA arm have "failed" from day 0. This bias predetermines the outcome of the trial.In routine practice, it is entirely normal to place a stent when there is an inadequate result from balloon angioplasty alone. Thus, PTA with bailout stenting is the current standard of practice in the superficial femoral artery. This should be compared with the experimental condition, namely, routine stent placement. This comparison is provided only as a post hoc analysis, and the results are much less convincing, with no significant difference between the treatment groups for target lesion revascularization and borderline significance for primary patency.At first glance, the implication of this trial is that the use of stents for intermediate-length lesions of the superficial femoral artery should be mandatory. This could have a substantial impact on the cost of treatment. Closer examination of the data indicates that the evidence is at best borderline and in itself does not yet merit a wholesale switch from selective to routine use of stents in these lesions.Nicholas Chalmers, MBChB, FRCR Department of Radiology Manchester Royal Infirmary Manchester, United KingdomDisclosuresNone.References1. Laird JR, Katzen BT, Scheinert D, Lammer J, Carpenter J, Buchbinder M, Dave R, Ansel G, Lansky A, Cristea E, Collins TJ, Goldstein J, Jaff MRfor the RESILIENT Investigators. Nitinol stent implantation versus balloon angioplasty for lesions in the superficial femoral artery and proximal popliteal artery; twelve month results from the RESILIENT randomized trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010; 3:267–276.LinkGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited BySebastiani P and Perls T (2010) Prediction Models That Include Genetic Data, Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics, 3:1, (1-2), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2010. October 2010Vol 3, Issue 5 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics © 2010 American Heart Association, Inc.https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.958173PMID: 20959593 Originally publishedOctober 1, 2010 PDF download Advertisement SubjectsPeripheral Vascular Disease

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Qi完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
紫熊完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
38秒前
六一儿童节完成签到 ,获得积分0
44秒前
科研通AI6.3应助jiang采纳,获得30
56秒前
1分钟前
无悔完成签到 ,获得积分0
1分钟前
1分钟前
belssingoo发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
房天川完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
韩较瘦发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
天天向上小螃蟹完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
Singularity完成签到,获得积分0
2分钟前
缪忆寒完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
WFGodot应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
369ninja应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
我是笨蛋完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
李木禾完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
Sunny完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
无限的画板完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
tetrisxzs完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
lzm完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
知画春秋完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
Hg完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
Jasper应助qaz123采纳,获得10
4分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
369ninja应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4分钟前
如歌完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
qaz123发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
核桃完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
5分钟前
cadcae完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
5分钟前
jiang发布了新的文献求助30
6分钟前
自然亦凝完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition 510
Social Skills Improvement System-Rating Scales--Chinese Version 500
Dynamische Polarisation von H-1 und B-11 in (CH-3)-3NBH-3 500
CLSI M07 2024 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7247773
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8870711
关于积分的说明 18712254
捐赠科研通 6926224
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3197998
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2373776
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2172888