Letter by Chalmers Regarding Article “Nitinol Stent Implantation Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery and Proximal Popliteal Artery: Twelve-Month Results From the RESILIENT Randomized Trial”

医学 血管成形术 气球 支架 随机对照试验 外科 腘动脉 股动脉 经皮 股浅动脉 血运重建 放射科 心脏病学 心肌梗塞
作者
Nicholas Chalmers
出处
期刊:Circulation-cardiovascular Interventions [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:3 (5): e22; author reply e23-e22; author reply e23 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1161/circinterventions.110.958173
摘要

HomeCirculation: Cardiovascular InterventionsVol. 3, No. 5Letter by Chalmers Regarding Article "Nitinol Stent Implantation Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery and Proximal Popliteal Artery: Twelve-Month Results From the RESILIENT Randomized Trial" Free AccessLetterPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessLetterPDF/EPUBLetter by Chalmers Regarding Article "Nitinol Stent Implantation Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery and Proximal Popliteal Artery: Twelve-Month Results From the RESILIENT Randomized Trial" Nicholas Chalmers, MBChB, FRCR Nicholas ChalmersNicholas Chalmers Department of RadiologyManchester Royal InfirmaryManchester, United Kingdom (Chalmers) Originally published1 Oct 2010https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.958173Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2010;3:e22To the Editor:The authors of the RESILIENT trial1 have adopted a trial design that by their own admission is controversial. They have randomly assigned patients to either percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) or stent placement but have then analyzed the outcomes using different primary end points for each group. This is surely more than controversial: It is a travesty of scientific method.The authors have determined that all patients in the PTA arm of the trial who cross over to stent placement during the index procedure are classified as reaching the primary end point (and having target lesion revascularization), whereas those in the primary stent arm of the trial (who have undergone an identical procedure) are not. Thus, 40% of the PTA arm have "failed" from day 0. This bias predetermines the outcome of the trial.In routine practice, it is entirely normal to place a stent when there is an inadequate result from balloon angioplasty alone. Thus, PTA with bailout stenting is the current standard of practice in the superficial femoral artery. This should be compared with the experimental condition, namely, routine stent placement. This comparison is provided only as a post hoc analysis, and the results are much less convincing, with no significant difference between the treatment groups for target lesion revascularization and borderline significance for primary patency.At first glance, the implication of this trial is that the use of stents for intermediate-length lesions of the superficial femoral artery should be mandatory. This could have a substantial impact on the cost of treatment. Closer examination of the data indicates that the evidence is at best borderline and in itself does not yet merit a wholesale switch from selective to routine use of stents in these lesions.Nicholas Chalmers, MBChB, FRCR Department of Radiology Manchester Royal Infirmary Manchester, United KingdomDisclosuresNone.References1. Laird JR, Katzen BT, Scheinert D, Lammer J, Carpenter J, Buchbinder M, Dave R, Ansel G, Lansky A, Cristea E, Collins TJ, Goldstein J, Jaff MRfor the RESILIENT Investigators. Nitinol stent implantation versus balloon angioplasty for lesions in the superficial femoral artery and proximal popliteal artery; twelve month results from the RESILIENT randomized trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010; 3:267–276.LinkGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited BySebastiani P and Perls T (2010) Prediction Models That Include Genetic Data, Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics, 3:1, (1-2), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2010. October 2010Vol 3, Issue 5 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics © 2010 American Heart Association, Inc.https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.958173PMID: 20959593 Originally publishedOctober 1, 2010 PDF download Advertisement SubjectsPeripheral Vascular Disease
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
传奇3应助高佳智采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
GS发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
完美世界应助磨磨采纳,获得30
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
javalin完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Mid完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
万能图书馆应助fsxadada123采纳,获得10
3秒前
机灵若灵关注了科研通微信公众号
3秒前
lavande发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
深情安青应助久9采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
11关注了科研通微信公众号
4秒前
李健的粉丝团团长应助zxm采纳,获得10
4秒前
chongyue完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
Harry发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
缄默发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
wq发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
leavesziqi发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Bingo完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
科研通AI6应助SN采纳,获得10
6秒前
善学以致用应助那谁谁采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
mingxingzhou完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
7秒前
领导范儿应助娇气的背包采纳,获得10
7秒前
在水一方应助安静的嘚嘚采纳,获得10
7秒前
597完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
李健的粉丝团团长应助syx采纳,获得10
7秒前
CST关注了科研通微信公众号
7秒前
燕窝窝发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
cch发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Qz发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
高分求助中
Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science Third edition 2025 12000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.). Frederic G. Reamer 800
Beyond the sentence : discourse and sentential form / edited by Jessica R. Wirth 600
Holistic Discourse Analysis 600
Vertébrés continentaux du Crétacé supérieur de Provence (Sud-Est de la France) 600
Reliability Monitoring Program 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5341667
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4477790
关于积分的说明 13936857
捐赠科研通 4373983
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2403246
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1396065
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1368096