Information resource attributes

作者
Philip Hider
出处
期刊:Facet eBooks [Facet]
卷期号:: 15-32
标识
DOI:10.29085/9781783300754.003
摘要

Introduction In the previous chapter, we talked of metadata elements , the building blocks of information resource description. Each element describes an aspect, or attribute , of the information resource. Its title, author, subject, size, publication date and so on – all are attributes that could be described if applicable to a particular resource. As was mentioned, there are countless ways in which one could look at, and therefore describe, an information resource. Clearly, some attributes are more relevant in the provision of information access than are others. This chapter will discuss which attributes are likely to be more important, and why. In some more technical discussions, a resource's attributes are distinguished from its relationships to other entities. In such a model, a book's size might be considered an attribute, whereas its author might be considered another entity with an ‘authorial’ relationship to the book. The distinction will not be pursued here, however, as ultimately it is one of expression: any attribute could be expressed as a relationship between two entities (e.g. the concept ‘folio’ might have a ‘size’ relationship to a book), and any relationship could be expressed as an attribute (e.g. of authorship). Nevertheless, expressing and presenting metadata in the form of relationships can be a very effective mode of description, as we shall later observe. Describer and user contexts Information resource description is inevitably biased: it is influenced by the motives, situation, limitations and world-view of its creator. This is true regardless of how much the creator wishes to assist prospective users. Even information professionals, who may profess a ‘neutral’ position, will invariably have a particular take on how best to serve users’ needs. The field of information organization has developed various policies and standards that are generally regarded as ‘good practice’, but no one would seriously contend that any of them were perfect solutions (even in a particular context). Nevertheless, metadata creators should all start with the same fundamental question: what metadata will most help users to obtain the information they are looking for? The question begs another, of course: who are the users? We should distinguish here between users of the metadata itself and users of the resources that the metadata represents. They are not always the same. For instance, a parent might use metadata to find a suitable story book for their child.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
三清小爷完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
烟花应助温暖小霸王采纳,获得10
刚刚
那里有颗星星完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
LYegoist完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
111完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
愉快的嵩完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
康乐发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
自建发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
orixero应助lxy采纳,获得10
3秒前
核动力稳定完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
asl1994发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
huhuiya发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Akim应助典雅胜采纳,获得10
5秒前
冷傲的莫言完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
小茶应助无奈的小懒虫采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
搞怪的听寒完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
舒心凡桃完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
英姑应助adai采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
饭神仙鱼完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
chang完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
李大瓜发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
小郭发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The anomeric effect 1314
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7736083
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9286141
关于积分的说明 20175821
捐赠科研通 7314255
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3305231
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2457612
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2314646