Mixed qualitative–quantitative approach for bidding decisions in construction

投标 定量分析(化学) 决策支持系统 重新使用 计算机科学 定性性质 业务 知识管理 管理科学 运筹学 数据挖掘 机器学习 工程类 营销 化学 废物管理 色谱法
作者
Emad Mohamed,Parinaz Jafari,Ahmed Hammad
出处
期刊:Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management [Emerald (MCB UP)]
卷期号:29 (6): 2328-2357 被引量:13
标识
DOI:10.1108/ecam-12-2020-1060
摘要

Purpose The bid/no-bid decision is critical to the success of construction contractors. The factors affecting the bid/no-bid decision are either qualitative or quantitative. Previous studies on modeling the bidding decision have not extensively focused on distinguishing qualitative and quantitative factors. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to improve the bidding decision in construction projects by developing tools that consider both qualitative and quantitative factors affecting the bidding decision. Design/methodology/approach This study proposes a mixed qualitative-quantitative approach to deal with both qualitative and quantitative factors. The mixed qualitative-quantitative approach is developed by combining a rule-based expert system and fuzzy-based expert system. The rule-based expert system is used to evaluate the project based on qualitative factors and the fuzzy expert system is used to evaluate the project based on the quantitative factors in order to reach the comprehensive bid/no-bid decision. Findings Three real bidding projects are used to investigate the applicability and functionality of the proposed mixed approach and are tested with experts of a construction company in Alberta, Canada. The results demonstrate that the mixed approach provides a more reliable, accurate and practical tool that can assist decision-makers involved in the bid/no-bid decision. Originality/value This study contributes theoretically to the body of knowledge by (1) proposing a novel approach capable of modeling all types of factors (either qualitative or quantitative) affecting the bidding decision, and (2) providing means to acquire, store and reuse expert knowledge. Practical contribution of this paper is to provide decision-makers with a comprehensive model that mimics the decision-making process and stores experts' knowledge in the form of rules. Therefore, the model reduces the administrative burden on the decision-makers, saves time and effort and reduces bias and human errors during the bidding process.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
领导范儿应助junnan采纳,获得10
1秒前
勤奋的远锋完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Jasper应助玛卡巴卡采纳,获得10
1秒前
孟器应助玛卡巴卡采纳,获得10
1秒前
浮游应助玛卡巴卡采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
科研通AI6应助玛卡巴卡采纳,获得10
1秒前
罐罐儿应助玛卡巴卡采纳,获得10
1秒前
可爱的函函应助玛卡巴卡采纳,获得10
1秒前
柏林寒冬应助玛卡巴卡采纳,获得10
1秒前
隐形曼青应助玛卡巴卡采纳,获得10
1秒前
pipi发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
小火车发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
yy发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
损我空发布了新的文献求助20
3秒前
3秒前
ZRBY发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
3秒前
大模型应助健忘的小懒虫采纳,获得10
3秒前
慕青应助咸鱼Chen采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
高玉峰发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
寒江雪发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
无限续发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
donghaili发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
nnc发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
刚子完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
干净以珊完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
tianruiyi完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
高分求助中
Aerospace Standards Index - 2025 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 1000
Teaching Language in Context (Third Edition) 1000
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 961
流动的新传统主义与新生代农民工的劳动力再生产模式变迁 500
Historical Dictionary of British Intelligence (2014 / 2nd EDITION!) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5446527
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4555528
关于积分的说明 14252304
捐赠科研通 4477993
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2453459
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1444257
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1420353