Validating screening tools for depression in epilepsy

金标准(测试) 癫痫 萧条(经济学) 医院焦虑抑郁量表 病人健康调查表 共病 人口 医学 焦虑 精神科 物理疗法 内科学 抑郁症状 环境卫生 经济 宏观经济学
作者
Kirsten M. Fiest,Scott B. Patten,Samuel Wiebe,Andrew G. M. Bulloch,Colleen J. Maxwell,Nathalie Jetté
出处
期刊:Epilepsia [Wiley]
卷期号:55 (10): 1642-1650 被引量:67
标识
DOI:10.1111/epi.12754
摘要

Summary Objective Depression is a common comorbidity of epilepsy, and its timely identification in persons with epilepsy is essential. The use of screening tools to detect depression is common in epilepsy, but some scales in current use have not been validated using a gold standard in this population. The present study aims to validate three commonly used depression‐screening scales and assess new cut points for scoring in those with epilepsy. Methods Persons with epilepsy (n = 300) from the only epilepsy clinic in a large urban health region completed questionnaires (e.g., sociodemographics, adverse event profile) and three depression‐screening tools (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [ HADS ]; Patient Health Questionnaire [ PHQ ]‐9 and PHQ ‐2). One hundred eighty‐five patients participated in a gold‐standard structured clinical interview to assess depression. The diagnostic accuracy of the depression scales was assessed comparing a variety of scoring cut points to the gold‐standard diagnosis of depression. Results The prevalence of current depression in this population, according to the gold‐standard, was 14.6%. The scale with the highest sensitivity (84.6%) was the HADS with a cut point of 6 and the scale with the highest specificity (96.2%) was the PHQ ‐9 algorithm scoring method. Overall, the PHQ ‐9 at a cut point of 9 and the HADS at a cut point of 7 resulted in the greatest balance of sensitivity and specificity (area under the curve: 88% and 90%, respectively). Significance The PHQ ‐9 at a cut point of 9 and the HADS at a cut point of 7 had the best overall balance of sensitivity and specificity. However, for screening purposes the PHQ ‐9 algorithm method is ideal (optimizing specificity), whereas for case finding the HADS at a cut point of 6 performed best (optimizing sensitivity). Appropriate scale cut points should be chosen based on the study's goals and available resources. Disease‐specific scale cut points are recommended for future studies assessing depression in persons with epilepsy.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
yyx完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
丁丁当当完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
略略略完成签到,获得积分0
1秒前
请结合临床完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
wenbin完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
英勇哈密瓜数据线完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
等待念之完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
百十余完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
cdercder应助lhl采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
缺缺完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
韦诗涵完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
dde应助初景采纳,获得10
4秒前
加贝完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
Hello应助管夜白采纳,获得30
5秒前
changhao6787完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
adamchris完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
15503116087完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
傻傻的怡完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
小曾完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
滑天下之稽完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
sunday2024完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
贪玩的秋柔应助whywhy采纳,获得20
7秒前
奋斗的大白菜完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
博修完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
mengshang完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
新野完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
虞访云完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
拼搏的飞薇完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
Robert完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
格子完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
陆陆完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
splemeth完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
优雅含莲完成签到 ,获得积分0
11秒前
英姑应助BaiX采纳,获得10
12秒前
勤恳枕头完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
sssss完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
高分求助中
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 1234
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Burger's Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery 400
A Step-by-Step Guide to Qualitative Data Coding 2nd Edition 400
Impact of Storage Orientation and Duration on Prefilled Syringe Performance: Break-Loose and Glide Forces, and Injection Time Across Multiple Time Points 360
Programming for Chemical Engineers Using C, C++, and MATLAB 300
Upland Kenya wild flowers and ferns: a flora of the flowers, ferns, grasses, and sedges of highland Kenya 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6664070
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8413933
关于积分的说明 17985470
捐赠科研通 5869018
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2975322
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1951216
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1877565