金标准(测试)
癫痫
萧条(经济学)
医院焦虑抑郁量表
病人健康调查表
共病
人口
医学
焦虑
精神科
物理疗法
内科学
抑郁症状
环境卫生
经济
宏观经济学
作者
Kirsten M. Fiest,Scott B. Patten,Samuel Wiebe,Andrew G. M. Bulloch,Colleen J. Maxwell,Nathalie Jetté
出处
期刊:Epilepsia
[Wiley]
日期:2014-08-28
卷期号:55 (10): 1642-1650
被引量:67
摘要
Summary Objective Depression is a common comorbidity of epilepsy, and its timely identification in persons with epilepsy is essential. The use of screening tools to detect depression is common in epilepsy, but some scales in current use have not been validated using a gold standard in this population. The present study aims to validate three commonly used depression‐screening scales and assess new cut points for scoring in those with epilepsy. Methods Persons with epilepsy (n = 300) from the only epilepsy clinic in a large urban health region completed questionnaires (e.g., sociodemographics, adverse event profile) and three depression‐screening tools (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [ HADS ]; Patient Health Questionnaire [ PHQ ]‐9 and PHQ ‐2). One hundred eighty‐five patients participated in a gold‐standard structured clinical interview to assess depression. The diagnostic accuracy of the depression scales was assessed comparing a variety of scoring cut points to the gold‐standard diagnosis of depression. Results The prevalence of current depression in this population, according to the gold‐standard, was 14.6%. The scale with the highest sensitivity (84.6%) was the HADS with a cut point of 6 and the scale with the highest specificity (96.2%) was the PHQ ‐9 algorithm scoring method. Overall, the PHQ ‐9 at a cut point of 9 and the HADS at a cut point of 7 resulted in the greatest balance of sensitivity and specificity (area under the curve: 88% and 90%, respectively). Significance The PHQ ‐9 at a cut point of 9 and the HADS at a cut point of 7 had the best overall balance of sensitivity and specificity. However, for screening purposes the PHQ ‐9 algorithm method is ideal (optimizing specificity), whereas for case finding the HADS at a cut point of 6 performed best (optimizing sensitivity). Appropriate scale cut points should be chosen based on the study's goals and available resources. Disease‐specific scale cut points are recommended for future studies assessing depression in persons with epilepsy.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI