Validating screening tools for depression in epilepsy

金标准(测试) 癫痫 萧条(经济学) 医院焦虑抑郁量表 病人健康调查表 共病 人口 医学 焦虑 精神科 物理疗法 内科学 抑郁症状 环境卫生 经济 宏观经济学
作者
Kirsten M. Fiest,Scott B. Patten,Samuel Wiebe,Andrew G. M. Bulloch,Colleen J. Maxwell,Nathalie Jetté
出处
期刊:Epilepsia [Wiley]
卷期号:55 (10): 1642-1650 被引量:67
标识
DOI:10.1111/epi.12754
摘要

Summary Objective Depression is a common comorbidity of epilepsy, and its timely identification in persons with epilepsy is essential. The use of screening tools to detect depression is common in epilepsy, but some scales in current use have not been validated using a gold standard in this population. The present study aims to validate three commonly used depression‐screening scales and assess new cut points for scoring in those with epilepsy. Methods Persons with epilepsy (n = 300) from the only epilepsy clinic in a large urban health region completed questionnaires (e.g., sociodemographics, adverse event profile) and three depression‐screening tools (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [ HADS ]; Patient Health Questionnaire [ PHQ ]‐9 and PHQ ‐2). One hundred eighty‐five patients participated in a gold‐standard structured clinical interview to assess depression. The diagnostic accuracy of the depression scales was assessed comparing a variety of scoring cut points to the gold‐standard diagnosis of depression. Results The prevalence of current depression in this population, according to the gold‐standard, was 14.6%. The scale with the highest sensitivity (84.6%) was the HADS with a cut point of 6 and the scale with the highest specificity (96.2%) was the PHQ ‐9 algorithm scoring method. Overall, the PHQ ‐9 at a cut point of 9 and the HADS at a cut point of 7 resulted in the greatest balance of sensitivity and specificity (area under the curve: 88% and 90%, respectively). Significance The PHQ ‐9 at a cut point of 9 and the HADS at a cut point of 7 had the best overall balance of sensitivity and specificity. However, for screening purposes the PHQ ‐9 algorithm method is ideal (optimizing specificity), whereas for case finding the HADS at a cut point of 6 performed best (optimizing sensitivity). Appropriate scale cut points should be chosen based on the study's goals and available resources. Disease‐specific scale cut points are recommended for future studies assessing depression in persons with epilepsy.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
YCQ发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
llllll发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
柏林发布了新的文献求助30
1秒前
2秒前
墩墩发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
丰荣发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
雪山飞龙发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
123发布了新的文献求助30
4秒前
xiaoyy发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
WRWRWR发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
着急的傲菡完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
耗尽发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
Jasper应助Hey采纳,获得10
7秒前
PPone1完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
MIN完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
梅竹完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
YCQ完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
呆呆小猪完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
顾矜应助泡泡龙采纳,获得10
11秒前
llllll完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
肥肠的枣糕啊完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Akim应助科研通管家采纳,获得100
12秒前
英姑应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
情怀应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
callous完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
CipherSage应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
bkagyin应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
斯文败类应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
妮妮完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
14秒前
万能图书馆应助tkxfy采纳,获得10
14秒前
愁空山发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
英俊的铭应助丰荣采纳,获得10
14秒前
典雅的追命完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
xiongwenlei发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
高分求助中
Thinking Small and Large 500
Algorithmic Mathematics in Machine Learning 500
Mapping the Stars: Celebrity, Metonymy, and the Networked Politics of Identity 400
Getting Published in SSCI Journals: 200+ Questions and Answers for Absolute Beginners 300
Anti-Politics Machine: Development, Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho James Ferguson 200
Strutts and the Arkwrights, 1758-1830 200
A monograph of the genera Conocybe and Pholiotina in Europe 200
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3836894
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3379126
关于积分的说明 10507658
捐赠科研通 3099003
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1706635
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 821161
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 772451