亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Validating screening tools for depression in epilepsy

金标准(测试) 癫痫 萧条(经济学) 医院焦虑抑郁量表 病人健康调查表 共病 人口 医学 焦虑 精神科 物理疗法 内科学 抑郁症状 环境卫生 经济 宏观经济学
作者
Kirsten M. Fiest,Scott B. Patten,Samuel Wiebe,Andrew G. M. Bulloch,Colleen J. Maxwell,Nathalie Jetté
出处
期刊:Epilepsia [Wiley]
卷期号:55 (10): 1642-1650 被引量:67
标识
DOI:10.1111/epi.12754
摘要

Summary Objective Depression is a common comorbidity of epilepsy, and its timely identification in persons with epilepsy is essential. The use of screening tools to detect depression is common in epilepsy, but some scales in current use have not been validated using a gold standard in this population. The present study aims to validate three commonly used depression‐screening scales and assess new cut points for scoring in those with epilepsy. Methods Persons with epilepsy (n = 300) from the only epilepsy clinic in a large urban health region completed questionnaires (e.g., sociodemographics, adverse event profile) and three depression‐screening tools (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [ HADS ]; Patient Health Questionnaire [ PHQ ]‐9 and PHQ ‐2). One hundred eighty‐five patients participated in a gold‐standard structured clinical interview to assess depression. The diagnostic accuracy of the depression scales was assessed comparing a variety of scoring cut points to the gold‐standard diagnosis of depression. Results The prevalence of current depression in this population, according to the gold‐standard, was 14.6%. The scale with the highest sensitivity (84.6%) was the HADS with a cut point of 6 and the scale with the highest specificity (96.2%) was the PHQ ‐9 algorithm scoring method. Overall, the PHQ ‐9 at a cut point of 9 and the HADS at a cut point of 7 resulted in the greatest balance of sensitivity and specificity (area under the curve: 88% and 90%, respectively). Significance The PHQ ‐9 at a cut point of 9 and the HADS at a cut point of 7 had the best overall balance of sensitivity and specificity. However, for screening purposes the PHQ ‐9 algorithm method is ideal (optimizing specificity), whereas for case finding the HADS at a cut point of 6 performed best (optimizing sensitivity). Appropriate scale cut points should be chosen based on the study's goals and available resources. Disease‐specific scale cut points are recommended for future studies assessing depression in persons with epilepsy.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
ray完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
顾矜应助bubble采纳,获得10
9秒前
NINO发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
Fluorite完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
莫奇完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
22秒前
NINO完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
Fluorite发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
28秒前
大模型应助keyboy采纳,获得10
55秒前
年年完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
keyboy发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
优秀灵雁发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
666关闭了666文献求助
1分钟前
keyboy完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
zqq完成签到,获得积分0
1分钟前
充电宝应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
无极微光应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
1分钟前
NexusExplorer应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
1分钟前
1分钟前
苹果板凳完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
今夕何夕完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
LeoYiS214完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
木十四完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
万能图书馆应助李微采纳,获得30
2分钟前
2分钟前
haooy111发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
haooy111完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
李微发布了新的文献求助30
3分钟前
焦糖布丁发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
3分钟前
lucky完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
Chloe完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
科目三应助焦糖布丁采纳,获得10
3分钟前
高分求助中
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 1234
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Competition Law: Cases and Materials, 5th edition 500
Introduction to Cosmetic Formulation and Technology, 2nd Edition 400
Petrology and Plate Tectonics,2025 400
Burger's Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery 400
A Step-by-Step Guide to Qualitative Data Coding 2nd Edition 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6706831
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8447454
关于积分的说明 18040442
捐赠科研通 5947751
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2991336
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1967294
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1913626