医学
偏头痛
慢性偏头痛
紧张性头痛
观察研究
颈部疼痛
慢性疼痛
物理疗法
麻醉
内科学
病理
替代医学
作者
Ignacio Elizagaray-García,Gabriela Ferreira Carvalho,Tibor M. Szikszay,Wacław M. Adamczyk,Gonzalo Navarro-Fernández,Paula Alvarez-Testillano,Javier Díaz de Terán,Kerstin Luedtke,Alfonso Gil‐Martínez
出处
期刊:Cephalalgia
[SAGE Publishing]
日期:2021-12-07
卷期号:42 (7): 618-630
被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1177/03331024211060315
摘要
Background Clinical presentation is the key to the diagnosis of patients with migraine and tension-type headache, but features may overlap when both become chronic. Psychophysical parameters may distinguish both conditions. We aimed to compare psychophysical aspects of patients with chronic migraine, chronic tension-type headache and headache-free controls, and to determine whether these can predict headache frequency. Methods An examiner blinded to the diagnosis assessed 100 participants (chronic migraine (n = 38), chronic tension-type headache (n = 31) and controls (n = 31)). Assessed variables included painful area, pressure pain thresholds, temporal summation, cervical range of motion, neck posture, headache and neck impact, quality of life, and kinesiophobia. Comparison between groups was performed with one-way ANOVA and multiple linear regression was used to assess the headache frequency predictors. Results We found differences of both headache groups compared to controls ( p < 0.01), but not between headache groups. Neck disability was a significant predictor of headache frequency for chronic tension-type headache (adjusted R 2 = 0.14; β = 0.43; p = 0.03) and chronic migraine (adjusted R 2 = 0.18; β = 0.51; p < 0.01). Conclusions Chronic tension-type headache and chronic migraine showed similar psychophysical results, but were significantly worse when compared to controls. The psychophysical examination did not discriminate between headache types. The variable best explaining headache frequency for both headache types was neck disability.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI