地质学
地球物理学
反演(地质)
人工神经网络
深度学习
堆栈(抽象数据类型)
电阻抗
地震学
人工智能
计算机科学
工程类
电气工程
构造学
程序设计语言
作者
Bo Zhang,Yitao Pu,Ruiqi Dai,Danping Cao
出处
期刊:Interpretation
[Society of Exploration Geophysicists]
日期:2024-11-25
卷期号:13 (2): T219-T232
被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1190/int-2024-0041.1
摘要
Abstract Traditionally, seismic poststack impedance inversion is implemented using linear optimization algorithms. Recently, deep-learning neural networks have been successfully used to estimate the impedance from seismic data. First, we determine the general workflow of seismic poststack impedance inversion using supervised neural network (SNN). Next, we work to compute seismic impedance using geophysics-informed neural network (GINN). Similar to linear optimization algorithms, the inputs of GINN include real seismograms, a wavelet, and a low-frequency model. The loss function of GINN is designed to minimize the difference between real seismograms and synthetic seismic seismograms that are computed from the estimated impedance and input wavelet. To avoid lateral discontinuity of estimated impedance, the weights of GINN are trained using the seismograms of all seismic traces. We use synthetic and real seismic data to discuss the advantages and limitations of GINN, SNN, and traditional linear optimization algorithms. Not surprisingly, the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of seismic data and the phase of seismic wavelet are the most important factors that affect the accuracy of impedance estimated using GINN. The accuracy and resolution of impedance estimated using GINN is higher than linear optimization and SNN if the seismic data have a high S/N. The synthetic examples demonstrate that the accuracy of impedance calculated using SNN increases with the number of available training wells and linear optimization algorithms are more robust to noise than GINN and SNN.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI