医学
穴位按压
针灸科
止吐药
恶心
穴位
呕吐
术后恶心呕吐
不利影响
麻醉
科克伦图书馆
经皮神经电刺激
随机对照试验
临床试验
物理疗法
外科
内科学
替代医学
病理
作者
Anna Lee,Simon K. C. Chan,Lawrence TY Fan
出处
期刊:The Cochrane library
[Elsevier]
日期:2015-11-02
卷期号:2016 (6): CD003281-CD003281
被引量:570
标识
DOI:10.1002/14651858.cd003281.pub4
摘要
There is low-quality evidence supporting the use of PC6 acupoint stimulation over sham. Compared to the last update in 2009, no further sham comparison trials are needed. We found that there is moderate-quality evidence showing no difference between PC6 acupoint stimulation and antiemetic drugs to prevent PONV. Further PC6 acupoint stimulation versus antiemetic trials are futile in showing a significant difference, which is a new finding in this update. There is inconclusive evidence supporting the use of a combined strategy of PC6 acupoint stimulation and antiemetic drug over drug prophylaxis, and further high-quality trials are needed.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI