反向运动
康复
仿形(计算机编程)
医学
物理医学与康复
考试(生物学)
背景(考古学)
跳跃
心理学
物理疗法
计算机科学
物理
量子力学
生物
操作系统
古生物学
作者
Chris Bishop,Matthew J. Jordan,Lorena Torres-Ronda,Irineu Loturco,John R. Harry,Adam Virgile,Peter Mundy,Anthony N. Turner,Paul Comfort
标识
DOI:10.1519/ssc.0000000000000772
摘要
ABSTRACT The countermovement jump (CMJ) is one of the most used performance assessments in strength and conditioning. Although numerous studies discuss the usability of different metrics in this test, this is often performed within the context of a specific aim. However, to our knowledge, no information currently exists providing practitioners with some over-arching recommendations on which metrics to choose when the purpose of using the test differs. This article discusses how the metrics selected to monitor during CMJ testing may differ when aiming to use it as a proxy for athletic performance, as part of neuromuscular fatigue monitoring, or as part of a test battery for return to performance in injured athletes.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI