反向运动
康复
Plyometrics公司
医学
物理医学与康复
跳跃
物理疗法
计算机科学
物理
量子力学
作者
Chris Bishop,Matthew J. Jordan,Lorena Torres-Ronda,Irineu Loturco,John R. Harry,Adam Virgile,Peter D. Mundy,Anthony N. Turner,Paul Comfort
出处
期刊:Strength and Conditioning Journal
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2023-01-09
卷期号:45 (5): 545-553
被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1519/ssc.0000000000000772
摘要
ABSTRACT The countermovement jump (CMJ) is one of the most used performance assessments in strength and conditioning. Although numerous studies discuss the usability of different metrics in this test, this is often performed within the context of a specific aim. However, to our knowledge, no information currently exists providing practitioners with some over-arching recommendations on which metrics to choose when the purpose of using the test differs. This article discusses how the metrics selected to monitor during CMJ testing may differ when aiming to use it as a proxy for athletic performance, as part of neuromuscular fatigue monitoring, or as part of a test battery for return to performance in injured athletes.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI