A feasibility study to understand the components of behavioral sleep extension

Objectives: The goal of this study was to examine the contribution of sleep extension intervention components (wearable sleep tracker and coaching) on sleep extension outcomes. Patient involvement: This study collected open ended qualitative responses of treatment preference, acceptability, and feasibility as a key outcome. Methods: Adults aged 25 to 65 years with sleep duration <7 h and BMI ≥ 25 were randomized into one of four groups: Self-Management (control), Fitbit, Telephone Coaching, or Fitbit + Coaching. Self-report questionnaires and actigraphy were completed at baseline, post-intervention (6 weeks), and 12-weeks. Analyses used mixed models. Results: Among the 38 adults randomized, the Fitbit + Coaching group had larger but non-significant improvements in sleep duration compared with the self-management group. The coaching group demonstrated significant improvements in sleep-related impairment. All groups demonstrated feasibility and acceptability but the Fitbit + Coaching group reported themes of accountability. Conclusions: Results suggest that sleep extension interventions are feasible and acceptable but components affect the pattern of sleep and other outcomes. Practical implications: Sleep extension is feasible and acceptable; the combination of coaching and the wearable device may lead to larger changes in sleep due to enhanced accountability.