Comparison of propofol monotherapy and propofol combination therapy for sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

医学 异丙酚 镇静 随机对照试验 入射(几何) 麻醉 荟萃分析 内窥镜检查 不利影响 相对风险 内镜治疗 严格标准化平均差 置信区间 患者满意度 内科学 外科 物理 光学
作者
Sang Won Yoon,Geun Joo Choi,Oh Haeng Lee,Il Jae Yoon,Hyun Kang,Chong Wha Baek,Yong Hun Jung,Young Cheol Woo
出处
期刊:Digestive Endoscopy [Wiley]
卷期号:30 (5): 580-591 被引量:39
标识
DOI:10.1111/den.13050
摘要

Background and Aim Previous randomized controlled trials have reported conflicting findings comparing propofol combination therapy ( PCT ) with propofol monotherapy ( PMT ) for sedation of patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. Therefore, a systematic review was carried out to compare the efficacy and safety of PCT and PMT in such patients. Methods We searched MEDLINE , EMBASE and CENTRAL databases to identify all randomized controlled trials that compared the efficacy and safety of PCT and PMT for sedation of patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. Primary endpoints were incidence of respiratory complications, hypotension and arrhythmia, dose of propofol used, and recovery time. Procedure duration and the satisfaction of patients and doctors were also evaluated. Results A total of 2250 patients from 22 studies were included in the final analysis. The combined analysis did not show any difference between PCT and PMT in the incidence of respiratory complications (risk ratio [ RR ], 0.80; 95% CI , 0.52 to 1.23; I 2 = 58.34%), hypotension ( RR , 1.06; 95% CI , 0.63 to 1.78; I 2 = 72.13%), arrhythmia ( RR ,1.40; 95% CI , 0.74 to 2.64; I 2 = 43.71%), recovery time (standardized mean difference [ SMD ], 0.16; 95% CI , −0.49 to 0.81; I 2 = 95.9%), procedure duration ( SMD , 0.04; 95% CI , −0.05 to 0.14; I 2 = 0.0%), patient satisfaction ( SMD , 0.13; 95% CI , −0.26 to 0.52; I 2 = 89.63%) or doctor satisfaction ( SMD , 0.01; 95% CI , −0.15 to 0.17; I 2 = 0.00%). However, the dose of propofol used was significantly lower in PCT than in PMT ( SMD , −1.38; 95% CI , −1.99 to −0.77; I 2 = 97.70%). Conclusion PCT showed comparable efficacy and safety to PMT with respect to respiratory complications, hypotension and arrhythmia, recovery time, procedure duration, patient satisfaction, and doctor satisfaction. However, the average dose of propofol used was higher in PMT .
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
酷波er的应助被LALA采纳,获得10
1秒前
hh发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
genius_yue发布了新的文献求助30
4秒前
4秒前
Owen的应助被快点毕业采纳,获得10
5秒前
贾古文完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
7秒前
8秒前
WJC发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
Jasper的应助被Sincy采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
14秒前
1111发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
肉排卷发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
雨落瑾年完成签到,获得积分0
17秒前
17秒前
18秒前
快点毕业发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
桐桐的应助被yy采纳,获得10
20秒前
踏实的哑铃完成签到,获得积分20
22秒前
Sincy发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
daomaihu发布了新的文献求助100
24秒前
无语的从云完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
raffinose发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
25秒前
27秒前
炙热睿渊完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
小蘑材完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
29秒前
29秒前
踏实的哑铃关注了科研通微信公众号
30秒前
32秒前
32秒前
Badge发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
Arrow完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
吃猫的鱼发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)通过应助OA文献获取积分 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Computational Chemical Reaction Engineering: Modeling, Simulation, and Design with MATLAB 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 400
CLSI C56QG Examples of Hemolyzed, Icteric, and Lipemic/Turbid Samples Quick Guide 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 内科学 物理 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 复合材料 光电子学 细胞生物学 心理学 量子力学 催化作用 物理化学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7815381
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9344949
关于积分的说明 20526792
捐赠科研通 7408172
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3330903
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2477412
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2350575