Pharmacological interventions for the prevention of acute postoperative pain in adults following brain surgery

医学 止痛药 心理干预 随机对照试验 梅德林 不利影响 物理疗法 奇纳 开颅术 麻醉 内科学 政治学 精神科 法学
作者
I. Galvin,Ron Lévy,Andrew G. Day,Ian Gilron
出处
期刊:The Cochrane library [Elsevier]
卷期号:2019 (11) 被引量:19
标识
DOI:10.1002/14651858.cd011931.pub2
摘要

Background Pain following brain surgery can compromise recovery. Several pharmacological interventions have been used to prevent pain after craniotomy; however, there is currently a lack of evidence regarding which interventions are most effective. Objectives The objectives are to assess the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for prevention of acute postoperative pain in adults undergoing brain surgery; compare them in terms of additional analgesic requirements, incidence of chronic headache, sedative effects, length of hospital stay and adverse events; and determine whether these characteristics are different for certain subgroups. Search methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Web of Science and two trial registries together with reference checking and citation searching on 28th of November 2018. Selection criteria We included blinded and non‐blinded, randomized controlled trials evaluating pharmacological interventions for the prevention of acute postoperative pain in adults undergoing neurosurgery, which had at least one validated pain score outcome measure. Data collection and analysis We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. We calculated mean differences for the primary outcome of pain intensity; any pain scores reported on a 0 to 100 scale were converted to a 0 to 10 scale. Main results We included 42 completed studies (3548 participants) and identified one ongoing study. Nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatories (NSAIDs) Nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatories (NSAIDs) reduce pain up to 24 hours (0 to 6 hours, MD −1.16, 95% CI −1.57 to −0.76; 12 hours, MD −0.62, 95% CI −1.11 to −0.14; 24 hours, MD −0.66, 95% CI −1.18 to −0.13; 6 studies, 742 participants; all high‐quality evidence). Results for other outcomes were imprecise (additional analgesic requirements: MD 1.29 mg, 95% CI −5.0 to 2.46, 4 studies, 265 participants; nausea and vomiting RR 1.34, 95% CI 0.30 to 5.94, 2 studies, 345 participants; both low‐quality evidence). Dexmedetomidine reduces pain up to 12 hours (0 to 6 hours, MD −0.89, 95% CI −1.27 to −0.51, moderate‐quality evidence; 12 hours, MD −0.81, 95% CI −1.21 to −0.42, low‐quality evidence). It did not show efficacy at 24 hours (MD −0.08, 95% CI −0.32 to 0.16; 2 studies, 128 participants; low‐quality evidence). Dexmedetomidine may decrease additional analgesic requirements (MD −21.36 mg, 95% CI −34.63 to −8.1 mg, 2 studies, 128 participants, low‐quality evidence). Results for other outcomes were imprecise (nausea and vomiting RR −0.43, 95% CI 0.06 to 3.08, 3 studies, 261 participants; hypotension RR 0.5, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.28, 3 studies, 184 participants; both low‐quality evidence). Scalp blocks may reduce pain up to 48 hours (0 to 6 hours, MD −0.98, 95% CI −1.66 to −0.3, 10 studies, 414 participants; 12 hours, MD −0.95, 95% CI −1.53 to −0.37, 8 studies, 294 participants; 24 hours, MD −0.78, 95% CI −1.52 to −0.05, 9 studies, 433 participants, all low‐quality evidence; 48 hours, MD −1.34, 95% CI −2.57 to −0.11, 4 studies, 135 participants, very low‐quality evidence. When studies with high risk of bias were excluded, significance remained at 12 hours only. Scalp blocks may decrease additional analgesia requirements (SMD −1.11, 95% CI −1.97 to −0.25, 7 studies, 314 participants). Results for other outcomes were imprecise (nausea and vomiting RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.32, 4 studies, 165 participants, very low‐quality evidence). Scalp Infiltration may reduce pain postoperatively but efficacy was inconsistent, with a significant effect at 12 and 48 hours only (12 hours, MD −0.71, 95% CI −1.34 to −0.08, 7 studies, 309 participants, low‐quality evidence; 48 hours, MD ‐ 1.09, 95% CI ‐2.13 to ‐ 0.06, 3 studies, 128 participants, moderate‐quality evidence). No benefit was observed at other times (0 to 6 hours, MD −0.64, 95% CI −1.28 to −0.00, 9 studies, 475 participants, moderate‐quality evidence; 24 hours, MD −0.39, 95% CI −1.06 to 0.27,6 studies, 260 participants, low‐quality evidence. Scalp infiltration may reduce additional analgesia requirements MD −9.56 mg, 95% CI −15.64 to −3.49, 6 studies, 345 participants, very low‐quality evidence). When studies with high risk of bias were excluded, scalp infiltration lost the pain benefit at 12 hours and effects on additional analgesia requirements, but retained the pain‐reducing benefit at 48 hours (MD −0.56, 95% CI −1.20 to ‐0.32, 2 studies, 100 participants, very low‐quality evidence). Results for other outcomes were imprecise (nausea and vomiting, RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.41, 4 studies, 318 participants, low‐quality evidence). Pregabalin or gabapentin may reduce pain up to 6 hours (2 studies, 202 participants), MD ‐1.15,95% CI −1.66 to −0.6, 2 studies, 202 participants, low‐quality evidence). One study examined analgesic efficacy at 12 hours showing significant benefit. No analgesia efficacy was shown at later times (24 hours, MD ‐0.29, 95% CI ‐0.78 to ‐0.19; 48 hours, MD ‐ 0.06, 95% CI ‐0.86 to 0.77, 2 studies, 202 participants, low‐quality evidence). Additional analgesia requirements were not significantly less (MD −0.37 (95% CI −1.10 to 0.35, 3 studies, 234 participants, low‐quality evidence). Risk of nausea and vomiting was significantly reduced (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.89, 3 studies, 273 participants, low‐quality evidence). Results for other outcomes were imprecise (additional analgesia requirements: MD −0.37, 95% CI −1.10 to 0.35, 3 studies, 234 participants, low‐quality evidence). Acetaminophen did not show analgesic benefit (0 to 6 hours, MD −0.35, 95% CI −1.00 to 0.30; 12 hours, MD −0.51, 95% CI −1.04 to 0.03, 3 studies, 332 participants, moderate‐quality evidence; 24 hours, MD ‐0.34, 95% CI ‐1.20 to 0.52, 4 studies, 439 participants, high‐quality evidence). Results for other outcomes remained imprecise (additional analgesia requirements, MD 0.07, 95% CI −0.86 to 0.99, 4 studies, 459 participants, high‐quality evidence; length of hospitalizations, MD −3.71, 95% CI −14.12 to 6.7, 2 studies, 335 participants, moderate‐quality evidence). Authors' conclusions There is high‐quality evidence that NSAIDs reduce pain up to 24 hours postoperatively. The evidence for reductions in pain with dexmedetomidine, pregabalin or gabapentin, scalp blocks, and scalp infiltration is less certain and of very low to moderate quality. There is low‐quality evidence that scalp blocks and dexmedetomidine may reduce additional analgesics requirements. There is low‐quality evidence that gabapentin or pregabalin may decrease nausea and vomiting, with the caveat that the total number of events for this comparison was low.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
发嗲的黑夜完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Furina应助温暖傲松采纳,获得10
1秒前
李爱国应助研友_nPxrVn采纳,获得10
1秒前
喜羊羊七号完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
ymr完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Gao完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
贾狗蛋完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
内向的西装完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
彩色小海豚关注了科研通微信公众号
9秒前
9秒前
加菲丰丰应助xnhz采纳,获得20
9秒前
yfl完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
ccm完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
惠嘟嘟发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
LQX2141完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
善良的碧灵完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
Jwei完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
充电宝应助顺利的源智采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
丘比特应助怪咖采纳,获得10
15秒前
Eithan完成签到,获得积分20
15秒前
派大星完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
luan完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
someone完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
灵宝宝应助静姑娘采纳,获得20
18秒前
19秒前
淳于黎昕发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
21秒前
今后应助惠嘟嘟采纳,获得10
21秒前
23秒前
24秒前
yuyu完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
Lucas应助从从容容采纳,获得10
24秒前
25秒前
漂亮白云完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
25秒前
高分求助中
Clinical Epidemiology: The Essentials, 6e 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Graphene Handbook (2019 Edition) 800
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
IEST-RP-CC018: Cleanroom Cleaning and Sanitization: Operating and Monitoring Procedures 600
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6543490
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8333229
关于积分的说明 17857495
捐赠科研通 5650934
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2937010
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1913285
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1775374