Pharmacological interventions for the prevention of acute postoperative pain in adults following brain surgery

医学 止痛药 心理干预 随机对照试验 梅德林 不利影响 物理疗法 奇纳 开颅术 麻醉 内科学 政治学 精神科 法学
作者
I. Galvin,Ron Lévy,Andrew G. Day,Ian Gilron
出处
期刊:The Cochrane library [Elsevier]
卷期号:2019 (11) 被引量:19
标识
DOI:10.1002/14651858.cd011931.pub2
摘要

Background Pain following brain surgery can compromise recovery. Several pharmacological interventions have been used to prevent pain after craniotomy; however, there is currently a lack of evidence regarding which interventions are most effective. Objectives The objectives are to assess the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for prevention of acute postoperative pain in adults undergoing brain surgery; compare them in terms of additional analgesic requirements, incidence of chronic headache, sedative effects, length of hospital stay and adverse events; and determine whether these characteristics are different for certain subgroups. Search methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Web of Science and two trial registries together with reference checking and citation searching on 28th of November 2018. Selection criteria We included blinded and non‐blinded, randomized controlled trials evaluating pharmacological interventions for the prevention of acute postoperative pain in adults undergoing neurosurgery, which had at least one validated pain score outcome measure. Data collection and analysis We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. We calculated mean differences for the primary outcome of pain intensity; any pain scores reported on a 0 to 100 scale were converted to a 0 to 10 scale. Main results We included 42 completed studies (3548 participants) and identified one ongoing study. Nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatories (NSAIDs) Nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatories (NSAIDs) reduce pain up to 24 hours (0 to 6 hours, MD −1.16, 95% CI −1.57 to −0.76; 12 hours, MD −0.62, 95% CI −1.11 to −0.14; 24 hours, MD −0.66, 95% CI −1.18 to −0.13; 6 studies, 742 participants; all high‐quality evidence). Results for other outcomes were imprecise (additional analgesic requirements: MD 1.29 mg, 95% CI −5.0 to 2.46, 4 studies, 265 participants; nausea and vomiting RR 1.34, 95% CI 0.30 to 5.94, 2 studies, 345 participants; both low‐quality evidence). Dexmedetomidine reduces pain up to 12 hours (0 to 6 hours, MD −0.89, 95% CI −1.27 to −0.51, moderate‐quality evidence; 12 hours, MD −0.81, 95% CI −1.21 to −0.42, low‐quality evidence). It did not show efficacy at 24 hours (MD −0.08, 95% CI −0.32 to 0.16; 2 studies, 128 participants; low‐quality evidence). Dexmedetomidine may decrease additional analgesic requirements (MD −21.36 mg, 95% CI −34.63 to −8.1 mg, 2 studies, 128 participants, low‐quality evidence). Results for other outcomes were imprecise (nausea and vomiting RR −0.43, 95% CI 0.06 to 3.08, 3 studies, 261 participants; hypotension RR 0.5, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.28, 3 studies, 184 participants; both low‐quality evidence). Scalp blocks may reduce pain up to 48 hours (0 to 6 hours, MD −0.98, 95% CI −1.66 to −0.3, 10 studies, 414 participants; 12 hours, MD −0.95, 95% CI −1.53 to −0.37, 8 studies, 294 participants; 24 hours, MD −0.78, 95% CI −1.52 to −0.05, 9 studies, 433 participants, all low‐quality evidence; 48 hours, MD −1.34, 95% CI −2.57 to −0.11, 4 studies, 135 participants, very low‐quality evidence. When studies with high risk of bias were excluded, significance remained at 12 hours only. Scalp blocks may decrease additional analgesia requirements (SMD −1.11, 95% CI −1.97 to −0.25, 7 studies, 314 participants). Results for other outcomes were imprecise (nausea and vomiting RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.32, 4 studies, 165 participants, very low‐quality evidence). Scalp Infiltration may reduce pain postoperatively but efficacy was inconsistent, with a significant effect at 12 and 48 hours only (12 hours, MD −0.71, 95% CI −1.34 to −0.08, 7 studies, 309 participants, low‐quality evidence; 48 hours, MD ‐ 1.09, 95% CI ‐2.13 to ‐ 0.06, 3 studies, 128 participants, moderate‐quality evidence). No benefit was observed at other times (0 to 6 hours, MD −0.64, 95% CI −1.28 to −0.00, 9 studies, 475 participants, moderate‐quality evidence; 24 hours, MD −0.39, 95% CI −1.06 to 0.27,6 studies, 260 participants, low‐quality evidence. Scalp infiltration may reduce additional analgesia requirements MD −9.56 mg, 95% CI −15.64 to −3.49, 6 studies, 345 participants, very low‐quality evidence). When studies with high risk of bias were excluded, scalp infiltration lost the pain benefit at 12 hours and effects on additional analgesia requirements, but retained the pain‐reducing benefit at 48 hours (MD −0.56, 95% CI −1.20 to ‐0.32, 2 studies, 100 participants, very low‐quality evidence). Results for other outcomes were imprecise (nausea and vomiting, RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.41, 4 studies, 318 participants, low‐quality evidence). Pregabalin or gabapentin may reduce pain up to 6 hours (2 studies, 202 participants), MD ‐1.15,95% CI −1.66 to −0.6, 2 studies, 202 participants, low‐quality evidence). One study examined analgesic efficacy at 12 hours showing significant benefit. No analgesia efficacy was shown at later times (24 hours, MD ‐0.29, 95% CI ‐0.78 to ‐0.19; 48 hours, MD ‐ 0.06, 95% CI ‐0.86 to 0.77, 2 studies, 202 participants, low‐quality evidence). Additional analgesia requirements were not significantly less (MD −0.37 (95% CI −1.10 to 0.35, 3 studies, 234 participants, low‐quality evidence). Risk of nausea and vomiting was significantly reduced (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.89, 3 studies, 273 participants, low‐quality evidence). Results for other outcomes were imprecise (additional analgesia requirements: MD −0.37, 95% CI −1.10 to 0.35, 3 studies, 234 participants, low‐quality evidence). Acetaminophen did not show analgesic benefit (0 to 6 hours, MD −0.35, 95% CI −1.00 to 0.30; 12 hours, MD −0.51, 95% CI −1.04 to 0.03, 3 studies, 332 participants, moderate‐quality evidence; 24 hours, MD ‐0.34, 95% CI ‐1.20 to 0.52, 4 studies, 439 participants, high‐quality evidence). Results for other outcomes remained imprecise (additional analgesia requirements, MD 0.07, 95% CI −0.86 to 0.99, 4 studies, 459 participants, high‐quality evidence; length of hospitalizations, MD −3.71, 95% CI −14.12 to 6.7, 2 studies, 335 participants, moderate‐quality evidence). Authors' conclusions There is high‐quality evidence that NSAIDs reduce pain up to 24 hours postoperatively. The evidence for reductions in pain with dexmedetomidine, pregabalin or gabapentin, scalp blocks, and scalp infiltration is less certain and of very low to moderate quality. There is low‐quality evidence that scalp blocks and dexmedetomidine may reduce additional analgesics requirements. There is low‐quality evidence that gabapentin or pregabalin may decrease nausea and vomiting, with the caveat that the total number of events for this comparison was low.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
李爱国应助英俊书雪采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
Sonia发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
许个愿吧完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Fryanto发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
LQ完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
彼岸发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
啊吧啊吧发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Snmmer发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
诗轩完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
clare发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
ztl17523发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
erica发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
明棋发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
诗轩发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
chord发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
鲜艳的芝麻完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
国靖发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
大模型应助Snmmer采纳,获得10
12秒前
13秒前
梓树发布了新的文献求助200
13秒前
Behappy发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
小昊完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
二毛应助愉快八宝粥采纳,获得10
15秒前
16秒前
英俊书雪发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
大模型应助不吃蛋黄采纳,获得10
19秒前
baolong发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
hhy发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
21秒前
24秒前
24秒前
安一完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
默默完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Graphene Handbook (2019 Edition) 800
IEST-RP-CC018: Cleanroom Cleaning and Sanitization: Operating and Monitoring Procedures 600
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 600
Rehabilitation of Long-Standing Groin Pain in Athletes: A Scoping Review of Exercise Content and Reporting 500
The Immune System (Fifth Edition) 500
久松真一著作集〈第5巻〉禅と芸術 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6585602
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8359465
关于积分的说明 17901178
捐赠科研通 5727649
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2949559
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1925063
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1811501