光环
光学
镜头(地质)
材料科学
针孔(光学)
半径
亮度
球差
物理
多焦点人工晶状体
集中
角膜
假性白内障
人工晶状体
弯月面
色差
航程(航空)
焦点深度(构造)
会聚(光学)
作者
Clara García-Pedreño,Juan Tabernero,Harilaos Ginis,Lucía Hervella,Pablo Artal
标识
DOI:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001860
摘要
Purpose: To analyse the halo formation of several intraocular lenses (IOLs) in the optical bench. Setting: University of Murcia (Murcia, Spain). Design: In vitro study. Methods: Light from a green LED passed through a pinhole and was collimated. Each IOL was placed within a realistic model eye having a PMMA cornea with a physiological amount of spherical aberration and a 4.5 mm aperture. A CMOS sensor acted as the retina and a focus tunable lens was used to change the object’s vergence (range ±4 D). Series of images were captured with different exposure times and fused to get a high dynamic range (HDR) image. Performance was assessed by analysing the corresponding halo brightness and size. The tested lenses, that included biconvex and inverted meniscus IOLs, were: monofocals, extended depth-of-focus (EDOF), and diffractive trifocals. Results: Monofocal lenses produced halos with a radius close to 0.4 degrees. The halo radii of the non-diffractive EDOF lenses ranged between 0.45 and 0.63 degrees, whereas diffractive lenses had radii ranging from 0.84 to 1.22 degrees. The halo was generally dimmer for the refractive lenses and brighter for the diffractive. The through-focus images show that the halo size was larger at any defocus position for the diffractive lenses than for the rest of the tested IOLs. Conclusions: The diffractive IOLs exhibited a characteristic halo structure. Performance of the inverted meniscus and other non-diffractive lenses (Vivity and Eyhance) was comparable to a monofocal lens. This on-bench test can serve as an indication of the potential impact of photic phenomena on patient satisfaction.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI