A Comparative Study of Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin Over Gabapentin in Chronic Low Back Pain Associated with Lumbar Neuropathy – Prospective Randomized Trial

普瑞巴林 医学 加巴喷丁 可视模拟标度 麻醉 随机对照试验 腰痛 物理疗法 门诊部 腰椎 评定量表 止痛药 临床试验 神经病理性疼痛 不利影响 知情同意 背痛 疼痛量表 强度(物理) 前瞻性队列研究 类阿片 骨科手术 慢性疼痛
作者
MOHAMMED ABDUL FARHANA,R. ASHALATHA,Dr Subhan Basha,M Suresh Babu,S. SHARON SONIA
出处
期刊:International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research [Innovare Academic Sciences]
卷期号:: 96-99
标识
DOI:10.22159/ijcpr.2026v18i4.9058
摘要

Objective: To compare efficacy and safety of Pregnablen versus Gabapentin in chronic low back pain (LBP) associated with Lumbar Neuropathy. Methods: After clearance from Institutional Ethics Committee, written informed consent was taken from patients and patients were screened for selection criteria. This study was conducted among patients attending the outpatient Department of Orthopedics of Government Medical College and hospital, Ananthapur for a period of 6 mo from October 2023 to April 2024 by Department of Pharmacology in collaboration with Department of Orthopedics. A total of 60 (n=60) patients were observed in the study. They were divided into two groups of 30 patients in each group. First group was treated with Pregabalin 75 mgdaily night as test drug whereas the second group wasgiven Gabapentin 300 mg daily night as standard drug. The patients were followed up every week for a month. Pain intensity was assessed at the start of study i. e. at the baseline of 0 w, 1st week, 2nd week, 3rd week and 4th week using VAS and NRS scores. Results: In group a males are 83% and females 17%. In Group B males are 33% and females 67%. Pain Intensity was assessed by VAS (Visual Analogue Scale Scores) and NRS Scores (Numeric Rating Scale Scores). Pain Intensity Comparison (Visual Analogue Scale Scores)-Both drugs reduced pain over time, but Pregabalin showed statistically significantly greater pain relief compared to Gabapentin from the 2nd week onwards. p-values<0.05 indicates statistical significance. Pain Intensity Comparison (Numeric Rating Scale Scores)-Both drugs led to progressive pain reduction, but Pregabalin provided significantly better pain relief starting from Week 1 (earlier than VAS result). The highly significant p-values from Week 1 onwards (especially at Week 4) indicates a strong statistical difference favoring Pregabalin. During the study, the adverse effects observed due to study drugs are somnolence, dizziness and nausea.7 patient from Group A and 1 patients from Group B complained of somnolence.9 patients from Group A and 2 patients from Group B complained of dizziness.8 patient from Group A and 1 patients from Group B complained of nausea, difference between 2 groups was statistically significant (p value<0.05). Hence Gabapentin is more tolerable. Conclusion: Both drugs, Gabapentin and Pregabalin reduced pain over time. Pregabalin is more efficacious than Gabapentin and Gabapentin is more tolerable than Pregabalin.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
纸条条完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
6秒前
小幺发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
Juzco完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
OrangeMoon完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
爱撒娇的孤丹完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
zsp完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
丫丫完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
leeyolo完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
Likz完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
37秒前
小幺完成签到 ,获得积分10
37秒前
韩钰小宝完成签到 ,获得积分10
41秒前
wqdoctor完成签到 ,获得积分10
43秒前
DH完成签到 ,获得积分10
43秒前
lzs123发布了新的文献求助10
48秒前
Arctic完成签到 ,获得积分10
52秒前
plant完成签到,获得积分0
55秒前
mikeboying完成签到 ,获得积分10
58秒前
lzs123完成签到,获得积分20
1分钟前
睿O宝宝O发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
Murphy完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
0323完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
沫荔完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
刘濮源完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
赘婿应助雇凶暗杀蛋饺采纳,获得10
1分钟前
zhang完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
沈米米完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
听书人完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
aajhajkahna应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
搜集达人应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
onw完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
等待冰之完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
AA完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
乔杰完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
纯真的梦竹完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
w0r1d完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
Biscuit完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Römisch-Germanische Forschungen 1000
Social Psychology (第二版) 700
China Pluperfect I: Epistemology of Past and Outside in Chinese Art 520
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
The fast track to determining transfer functions of linear circuits: The student guide 500
The Analytical and Numerical Solution of Electric and Magnetic Fields 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7612955
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9188259
关于积分的说明 19683746
捐赠科研通 7186188
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3270770
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2434302
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2265667