捆绑
稳健性(进化)
计算机科学
经验证据
质量(理念)
产品(数学)
水准点(测量)
控制(管理)
营销
经济
业务
微观经济学
人工智能
数学
认识论
生物化学
化学
哲学
几何学
大地测量学
基因
地理
作者
Fabien Curto Millet,Stephen Lewis,Paul Stoddart
出处
期刊:Management Science
[Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences]
日期:2022-02-08
卷期号:68 (4): 3169-3174
被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2021.4276
摘要
Kim and Luca (2019) consider Google’s grouped results for local businesses (the “OneBox”). They contend that Google made a “strategic decision” to exclude reviews from other platforms (like Yelp) in these results and claim that this led to a quality degradation for search users, based on a randomized controlled trial (RCT) experiment. The purpose of this Comment is to clarify the robustness of Kim and Luca’s characterization of the situation and empirical findings, including in particular with respect to the noise and likely bias resulting from the control benchmark for the RCT experiment being based on a degraded version of Google’s OneBox, rather than the actual version. This paper was accepted by Alfonso Gambardella, business strategy.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI