亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Patient flow variability and unplanned readmissions to an intensive care unit.

作者
Gavin M. Joynt,Gordon Choi
出处
期刊:
标识
DOI:10.3410/f.1168457.751089
摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether high patient inflow volumes to an intensive care unit are associated with unplanned readmissions to the unit.DESIGN: Retrospective comparative analysis.SETTING: The setting is a large urban tertiary care academic medical center.PATIENTS: Patients (n = 3233) discharged from an adult neurosciences critical care unit to a lower level of care from January 1, 2006 through November 30, 2007.INTERVENTIONS: None.MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The main outcome variable is unplanned patient readmission to the neurosciences critical care unit within 72 hrs of discharge to a lower level of care. The odds of one or more discharges becoming an unplanned readmission within 72 hrs were nearly two and a half times higher on days when > or =9 patients were admitted to the neurosciences critical care unit (odds ratio, 2.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-4.26) compared with days with < or =8 admissions. The odds of readmission were nearly five times higher on days when > or =10 patients were admitted (odds ratio, 4.99; 95% confidence interval, 2.45-10.17) compared with days with < or =9 admissions. Adjusting for patient complexity, the odds of an unplanned readmission were 2.34 times higher for patients discharged to a lower level of care on days with > or =10 admissions to the neurosciences critical care unit (odds ratio, 2.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-4.34) compared with similar patients discharged on days of < or =9 admissions.CONCLUSIONS: Days of high patient inflow volumes to the unit were associated significantly with subsequent unplanned readmissions to the unit. Furthermore, the data indicate a possible dose-response relationship between intensive care unit inflow and patient outcomes. Further research is needed to understand how to defend against this risk for readmission. PMID: 19866504

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
ggjf完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
6秒前
科研通AI6.4应助研友_惊鸿采纳,获得10
16秒前
CodeCraft应助CLW采纳,获得10
17秒前
852应助下雨的颜色采纳,获得10
34秒前
35秒前
36秒前
41秒前
41秒前
研友_惊鸿发布了新的文献求助10
43秒前
搜集达人应助蓝朱采纳,获得10
45秒前
CLW发布了新的文献求助10
47秒前
AAZI完成签到 ,获得积分10
48秒前
CipherSage应助安静的以山采纳,获得10
52秒前
v0id应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
55秒前
55秒前
55秒前
v0id应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
55秒前
淡然的半烟完成签到,获得积分10
56秒前
哈哈啊哈发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
乐乐乐乐乐乐完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
12彡完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
Criminology34发布了新的文献求助200
1分钟前
1分钟前
青梨完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
Yeses完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
无花果应助陆玖笙采纳,获得10
1分钟前
熊猫奇思完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
华仔应助xin采纳,获得10
2分钟前
Lucas应助熊猫奇思采纳,获得10
2分钟前
辛勤尔珍完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
leolee完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
Ad14完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
Nana完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
APA handbook of comparative psychology: Basic concepts, methods, neural substrate, and behavior 1000
Health Psychology 1000
全员动态考核,锚定高质量发展:读懂同济大学教师人事改革新政的深层价值 900
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
The fast track to determining transfer functions of linear circuits: The student guide 500
Römisch-Germanische Forschungen 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7597402
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9174106
关于积分的说明 19640162
捐赠科研通 7174345
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3268235
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2432792
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2261463