A concurrent mixed‐method study exploring the experiences of interprofessional collaboration among Canadian midwives and obstetricians

主题分析 比例(比率) 产科 妇产科学 可靠性(半导体) 医学 有效性 护理部 定性研究 范围(计算机科学) 定性性质 执业范围 医学教育 心理学 医疗保健 功率(物理) 怀孕 心理测量学 计算机科学 社会学 生物 遗传学 社会科学 临床心理学 物理 量子力学 机器学习 经济 程序设计语言 经济增长
作者
Mohamed Toufic El Hussein,Susan Jacoby,Matthew J. W. McLarnon,Daniel Favell,Aliyah Dosani
出处
期刊:Journal of Advanced Nursing [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/jan.16183
摘要

This study explores the experiences of interprofessional collaboration of Canadian midwives and obstetricians from midwives' perspective.A concurrent mixed-methods approach that combined a small validation study and qualitative thematic analysis was used to provide evidence of the nature and importance of collaboration between Registered Midwives (RMs) and obstetricians.Eighteen RMs across Canada completed a demographic survey and the Midwifery-Obstetrician Collaboration (MOC) scale in 2023. The quantitative analyses were conducted to assess the reliability of the Midwifery-Obstetrician Collaboration (MOC) and accumulate preliminary evidence to support its validity. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 participants. After completing the interviews, themes were identified using thematic analysis.The primary themes identified were knowledge of midwifery scope affects collaboration, collaboration is necessary for effective patient care, midwife-physician collaboration is impacted by power differentials and hierarchies, and proposed methods to improve physician-midwife collaboration. Although a small sample size did not permit extensive statistical testing, the quantitative results supported the reliability of the MOC scale. In addition, a strong correlation between the MOC and the communication subscale of the Inter-Professional Collaboration (IPC) scale provided evidence of the MOC's concurrent validity as a measure of collaboration between midwives and physicians.This study provides support for the Midwifery-Obstetrics Collaboration (MOC) Scale as an assessment tool to evaluate collaboration between midwives and OB/GYNs in obstetrics care. While the 18 RMs recruited for this study provided a fulsome analysis for the qualitative portion, a larger study is necessary to provide more extensive quantitative analysis to validate the MOC scale for continued use among RMs and OBs.The implications of this study are to foster strong interprofessional relationships between midwives and OBs and to improve the health outcomes of pregnant women and newborns.The authors adhered to Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
1秒前
华仔应助鼠鼠想养猫采纳,获得10
2秒前
无语的怜梦完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
sos007完成签到 ,获得积分0
2秒前
小小鱼完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
ii完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
小白完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
马赛克完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
小易发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
ztt完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
凡人丿完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
Dc完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
pagoda完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
幽默春天发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
迷人的Jack发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
抹缇卡完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
ztt发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
guyan发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
爱听歌元风完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
godgg发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
健忘静曼发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
忘忧发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
FashionBoy应助小吴采纳,获得10
18秒前
gyx完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
NOVE完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
Lucas应助欣慰的鱼采纳,获得10
23秒前
结实如音发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
24秒前
25秒前
26秒前
高分求助中
Teaching Social and Emotional Learning in Physical Education 900
Plesiosaur extinction cycles; events that mark the beginning, middle and end of the Cretaceous 800
Recherches Ethnographiques sue les Yao dans la Chine du Sud 500
Two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis reveals causal relationships between blood lipids and venous thromboembolism 500
Chinese-English Translation Lexicon Version 3.0 500
Wisdom, Gods and Literature Studies in Assyriology in Honour of W. G. Lambert 400
薩提亞模式團體方案對青年情侶輔導效果之研究 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2392219
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2096830
关于积分的说明 5282903
捐赠科研通 1824416
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 909895
版权声明 559923
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 486236