The Discriminative Validity of “Nociceptive,” “Peripheral Neuropathic,” and “Central Sensitization” as Mechanisms-based Classifications of Musculoskeletal Pain

作者
Keith M. Smart,Catherine Blake,Anthony Staines,Catherine Doody
出处
期刊:The Clinical Journal of Pain [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:27 (8): 655-663 被引量:188
标识
DOI:10.1097/ajp.0b013e318215f16a
摘要

OBJECTIVES: Empirical evidence of discriminative validity is required to justify the use of mechanisms-based classifications of musculoskeletal pain in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the discriminative validity of mechanisms-based classifications of pain by identifying discriminatory clusters of clinical criteria predictive of "nociceptive," "peripheral neuropathic," and "central sensitization" pain in patients with low back (± leg) pain disorders. METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional, between-patients design using the extreme-groups method. Four hundred sixty-four patients with low back (± leg) pain were assessed using a standardized assessment protocol. After each assessment, patients' pain was assigned a mechanisms-based classification. Clinicians then completed a clinical criteria checklist indicating the presence/absence of various clinical criteria. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses using binary logistic regression with Bayesian model averaging identified a discriminative cluster of 7, 3, and 4 symptoms and signs predictive of a dominance of "nociceptive," "peripheral neuropathic," and "central sensitization" pain, respectively. Each cluster was found to have high levels of classification accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive values, positive/negative likelihood ratios). DISCUSSION: By identifying a discriminatory cluster of symptoms and signs predictive of "nociceptive," "peripheral neuropathic," and "central" pain, this study provides some preliminary discriminative validity evidence for mechanisms-based classifications of musculoskeletal pain. Classification system validation requires the accumulation of validity evidence before their use in clinical practice can be recommended. Further studies are required to evaluate the construct and criterion validity of mechanisms-based classifications of musculoskeletal pain.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
1秒前
songshubuhuifei完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
ndrise发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
我想睡觉发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Tinger发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
ATOM完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
烟里戏发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
高高的小蕾完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
zl完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
wuhaonan完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
社会主义接班人完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
桐桐应助诚心逍遥采纳,获得30
9秒前
疏梅居士完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
molihuakai应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
洋洋应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
Lucas应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
充电宝应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
JamesPei应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
Owen应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
大模型应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
SciGPT应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
13秒前
和云流彩应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
13秒前
我是老大应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
13秒前
Owen应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
李健应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
酷波er应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 500
CLSI VET01S-2024 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals (7th Ed) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7771510
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9314249
关于积分的说明 20337899
捐赠科研通 7356891
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3316706
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2465322
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2331700