半乳甘露聚糖
支气管肺泡灌洗
曲菌病
医学
曲霉
烟曲霉
血培养
内科学
胃肠病学
诊断试验
抗真菌
免疫学
微生物学
肺
抗生素
生物
兽医学
皮肤病科
作者
Susanne Eigl,Martin Hoenigl,Birgit Spieß,Sven Heldt,Juergen Prattes,Peter Neumeister,Albert Wölfler,Jasmin Rabensteiner,Florian Prüller,Robert Krause,Mark Reinwald,Holger Flick,Dieter Buchheidt,Tobias Boch
出处
期刊:Medical Mycology
[Oxford University Press]
日期:2016-10-14
卷期号:: myw102-myw102
被引量:48
摘要
In recent years galactomannan antigen testing (GM) and also Aspergillus PCR have become increasingly important for diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis (IA). Whether or not these tests need to be performed with bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF; i.e., primary site of infection), or testing of blood samples is sufficient, remains, however, a matter of debate. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of GM ELISA, and Aspergillus PCR by using BALF samples and blood samples obtained at the same day from a total of 53 immunocompromised patients (16 with probable/proven IA and 37 with no evidence of IA according to the revised EORTC/MSG criteria; 38 patients with hematological malignancies were prospectively enrolled at the Medical University of Graz, Austria, 15 patients with mixed underlying diseases at the Mannheim University Hospital). Patients with possible IA were excluded from this analysis. A total of 34/53 (64%) of all patients and 12/16 (75%) of patients with probable/proven IA received mold-active antifungal prophylaxis/therapy at the time of the BALF procedure. Sensitivities of GM and Aspergillus PCR were 38% and 44% in BALF, and 31% and 0% in blood, respectively. Best sensitivity (75%) for detecting proven/probable IA was achieved when BALF Aspergillus PCR, BALF GM (>1.0 ODI), BALF-culture and serum-GM (>0.5 ODI) were combined (specificity 95%). In conclusion, sensitivities of the evaluated diagnostic tests-when interpreted on their own-were low in BALF and even lower in blood, sensitivities increased markedly when diagnostic tests were combined.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI