来源可信度
可靠性
信息来源(数学)
微博
社会化媒体
书签
广告
心理学
计算机科学
互联网隐私
万维网
政治学
业务
统计
数学
法学
作者
Hyunjin Kang,Keunmin Bae,Shaoke Zhang,S. Shyam Sundar
标识
DOI:10.1177/107769901108800403
摘要
With the rise of intermediaries such as portals, social-bookmarking sites, and microblogs, online news is often carried through multiple sources. However, the perceived credibility of different source cues attached to a single news story can be quite different. So, how do readers evaluate the story? Do users factor in all distal sources, or do they simply refer to the proximate source delivering the news? Using a 2 (involvement) × 2 (proximal source credibility) × 2 (distal source credibility) full-factorial between-subjects experiment (N = 231), we found that while highly involved readers considered both types of sources, low-involvement readers were primarily influenced by the proximate source.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI