舍曲林
氯丙咪嗪
耐受性
临床全球印象
心理学
5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂
内科学
医学
麻醉
不利影响
抗抑郁药
安慰剂
病理
替代医学
海马体
作者
Jean‐Pierre Lépine,J. Goger,Carl A. Blashko,Charlotte Probst,Michael Moles,J. Kosolowski,B. Scharfetter,R. Lane
标识
DOI:10.1097/00004850-200015050-00003
摘要
This study compared the efficacy and safety of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor sertraline with that of the tricyclic antidepressant clomipramine in patients with severe depression, as defined by a baseline 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) of at least 25. The study included 166 outpatients, randomized to double-blind treatment with sertraline (50-200 mg) or clomipramine (50-150 mg) for 8 weeks. The efficacy of both treatments was similar, 74% of patients in the sertraline group and 71% of clomipramine patients being classified as responders at the end-point, as defined by a Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) score of 1 or 2. Mean HAM-D scores fell from 29.8 at baseline to 12.3 at endpoint in the sertraline group, and from 29.6-12.7 in the clomipramine group. There were more withdrawals due to adverse events in the clomipramine group than in the sertraline group (17% versus 12%). Dry mouth, tremor, dizziness and constipation were all substantially more common in the clomipramine group, whereas diarrhoea/loose stools was more common in the sertraline group. Overall, sertraline was as effective as clomipramine in this group of severely depressed outpatients, and showed better tolerability.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI