医学
骨关节炎
关节内
增粘剂
重症监护医学
临床试验
类风湿性关节炎
物理疗法
生物信息学
内科学
替代医学
病理
生物
作者
Ian A. Jones,Ryan Togashi,Melissa L. Wilson,Nathanael D. Heckmann,C. Thomas Vangsness
标识
DOI:10.1038/s41584-018-0123-4
摘要
Intra-articular drug delivery has a number of advantages over systemic administration; however, for the past 20 years, intra-articular treatment options for the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA) have been limited to analgesics, glucocorticoids, hyaluronic acid (HA) and a small number of unproven alternative therapies. Although HA and glucocorticoids can provide clinically meaningful benefits to an appreciable number of patients, emerging evidence indicates that the apparent effectiveness of these treatments is largely a result of other factors, including the placebo effect. Biologic drugs that target inflammatory processes are used to manage rheumatoid arthritis, but have not translated well into use in OA. A lack of high-level evidence and methodological limitations hinder our understanding of so-called ‘stem’ cell therapies and, although the off-label administration of intra-articular cell therapies (such as platelet-rich plasma and bone marrow aspirate concentrate) is common, high-quality clinical data are needed before these treatments can be recommended. A number of promising intra-articular treatments are currently in clinical development in the United States, including small-molecule and biologic therapies, devices and gene therapies. Although the prospect of new, non-surgical treatments for OA is exciting, the benefits of new treatments must be carefully weighed against their costs and potential risks. Intra-articular therapies for knee osteoarthritis (OA) are causing excitement among clinicians and patients, but care should be taken when choosing which therapy to use. In this Review, Vangsness and colleagues critically appraise current and future intra-articular therapies for knee OA.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI