Attributing experts' achievements to effort rather than to natural ability leads to better performance.

心理学 叙述的 归属 社会心理学 自然(考古学) 认知心理学 人际交往 集合(抽象数据类型) 框架(结构) 能力(人力资源) 估价(财务) 观察学习 功能(生物学) 归因偏差 体验式学习 规范性 认知 考试(生物学) 自然实验 偏爱 启发式 人际关系 领域(数学) 好奇心
作者
Nuria Tolsá-Caballero,Chia‐Jung Tsay
出处
期刊:Journal of Experimental Psychology: General [American Psychological Association]
卷期号:155 (6): 1479-1499
标识
DOI:10.1037/xge0001916
摘要

Prior research shows that how people interpret their own achievements-whether stemming from effort or natural talent-influences their motivation. Yet little is known about whether attributions for others' achievements shape observers' motivation and performance. Across five studies, we investigate the effects of attributions about the achievements of experts on learners. Studies 1-3 test the motivational impact of effort versus natural talent narratives-stories portraying achievements as driven by hard work or innate ability-using complementary approaches: an observational analysis of "Rate My Professors," the largest publicly available data set of teaching evaluations (N = 1,227); a preregistered lab experiment (N = 791); and a meta-analysis of 12 additional replication experiments (N = 3,563). Effort narratives enhanced learners' self-efficacy and valuation of effort, yielding better learning outcomes. Studies 4 and 5 tested whether effort narratives about experts outperform narratives without attributional cues and whether this advantage varies as a function of expertise level. In Study 4, a large randomized field experiment with Guatemalan high school students (N = 27,791), effort narratives about experts improved learning outcomes relative to no-cue narratives. The results of Study 5, a preregistered lab experiment (N = 1,576), suggest that effort narratives may particularly benefit learners who, in the absence of cues, default to natural talent explanations-a common pattern among participants. The advantages of effort versus no-cue narratives did not extend to peer role models, and among experts, differences in accomplishment did not moderate the effect. Together, our findings extend attribution theories of motivation into the interpersonal domain and suggest that framing experts' achievements as effort-based can be a powerful, low-cost tool to boost motivation and performance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
1秒前
seet的应助被dmy采纳,获得10
2秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
领导范儿的应助被HOHO采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
Yuan88发布了新的文献求助20
3秒前
超级的自行车完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
skp关闭了skp的文献求助
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
小蘑菇的应助被hbu123采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
研友_VZG7GZ的应助被wmxgg采纳,获得10
5秒前
Emily发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
12112321312完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
中杯西瓜冰完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
洋芋儿完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
xianyu发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
11完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Yuan88发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
动人的珩发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
仁爱海蓝完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
Ls发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
qingyun完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
小小完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
zz完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
丘比特的应助被Jessica采纳,获得10
8秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis, 14 Volume Set, 2nd Edition(本书共14册,本求助8volume-14volume共7册,独立harcover版本,非网络版本e-EROS 版,不能网络版转化PDF或提取PDF) 2000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 1000
Электротехническая система магнитожидкостной герметизации валов регулируемых электродвигателей 800
日本語と中国語及びチベット・ビルマ語の語源関連性に関する分析 800
Practical Manual of Forensic Psychophysiology: Methodology, Execution, and Fields of Application 800
Holistic Discourse Analysis, Second Edition by Robert E. Longacre 666
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 心理学 人工智能 细胞生物学 光电子学 无机化学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7963392
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9433355
关于积分的说明 21022232
捐赠科研通 7541271
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3371372
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2507001
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2403884