Optimum Baseline Clinical Severity Scale Cut Points for Prognosticating Intracerebral Hemorrhage: INTERACT Studies

医学 格拉斯哥昏迷指数 脑出血 冲程(发动机) 基线(sea) 比例(比率) 内科学 心脏病学 外科 地图学 机械工程 海洋学 地质学 工程类 地理
作者
Shoujiang You,Danni Zheng,Sohei Yoshimura,Menglu Ouyang,Qiao Han,Xia Wang,Yongjun Cao,Candice Delcourt,Lili Song,Hisatomi Arima,Xiaoying Chen,Chun-Feng Liu,Richard I. Lindley,Thompson Robinson,Craig S. Anderson,John Chalmers
出处
期刊:Stroke [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
被引量:9
标识
DOI:10.1161/strokeaha.123.044538
摘要

BACKGROUND: The optimal cut point of baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and Glasgow Coma Scale scores for prognosticating acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is unknown. METHODS: Secondary analyses of participant data are from the INTERACT (Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage Trials) 1 and 2 studies. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to compare the predictive performance of baseline NIHSS and Glasgow Coma Scale scores, ICH score, and max-ICH score. Optimal cut points for predicting 90-day clinical outcomes (death or major disability [defined as modified Rankin Scale scores 3–6], major disability [defined as modified Rankin Scale scores 3–5], and death alone) were determined using the Youden index. Logistic regression models were adjusted for age, sex, hematoma volume, and other known risk factors for poor prognosis. We validated our findings in the INTERACT1 database. RESULTS: There were 2829 INTERACT2 patients (age, 63.5±12.9 years; male, 62.9%; ICH volume, 10.96 [5.77–19.49] mL) included in the main analyses. The baseline NIHSS score (area under the curve, 0.796) had better prognostic utility for predicting death or major disability than the Glasgow Coma Scale score (area under the curve, 0.650) and ICH score (area under the curve, 0.674) and was comparable to max-ICH score (area under the curve, 0.789). Similar findings were observed when assessing the outcome of major disability. A cut point of 10 on baseline NIHSS optimally (sensitivity, 77.5%; specificity, 69.2%) predicted death or major disability (adjusted odds ratio, 4.50 [95% CI, 3.60–5.63]). The baseline NIHSS cut points that optimally predicted major disability and death alone were 10 and 12, respectively. The predictive effect of NIHSS≥10 for poor functional outcomes was consistent in all subgroups including age and baseline hematoma volume. Results were consistent when analyzed in the independent INTERACT1 validation database. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mild-to-moderate ICH, a baseline NIHSS score of ≥10 was optimal for predicting poor outcomes at 90 days. Prediction based on baseline NIHSS is better than baseline Glasgow Coma Scale score. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifiers: NCT00226096 and NCT00716079.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
3秒前
麻辣兔头发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
Replikant发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
扎心发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
梅子完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
jun发布了新的文献求助20
11秒前
LIKO完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
M跃发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
汉堡包应助xzy采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
下雨天发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
木头鱼发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
ajin发布了新的文献求助50
18秒前
庸人自扰完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
cgs发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
科研通AI5应助M跃采纳,获得30
23秒前
小六六完成签到,获得积分20
24秒前
24秒前
26秒前
Devoted发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
fh完成签到,获得积分20
34秒前
JerryZ发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
NexusExplorer应助Devoted采纳,获得10
37秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助20
37秒前
fh发布了新的文献求助30
38秒前
38秒前
跳跃豆芽发布了新的文献求助40
41秒前
41秒前
43秒前
思源应助Dr_zsc采纳,获得10
44秒前
Ma发布了新的文献求助10
44秒前
害羞的醉卉完成签到 ,获得积分10
46秒前
赘婿应助扎心采纳,获得10
48秒前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】请使用合适的网盘上传文件 10000
The Oxford Encyclopedia of the History of Modern Psychology 1500
Green Star Japan: Esperanto and the International Language Question, 1880–1945 800
Sentimental Republic: Chinese Intellectuals and the Maoist Past 800
The Martian climate revisited: atmosphere and environment of a desert planet 800
Parametric Random Vibration 800
城市流域产汇流机理及其驱动要素研究—以北京市为例 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3862963
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3405518
关于积分的说明 10644924
捐赠科研通 3129070
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1725612
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 831127
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 779615