A systematic review of large language models and their implications in medical education

可靠性 医学教育 梅德林 系统回顾 继续医学教育 医学 英语 心理学 政治学 继续教育 法学 数学教育
作者
Heidi Lucas,Jeffrey S. Upperman,Jamie R. Robinson
出处
期刊:Medical Education [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/medu.15402
摘要

Abstract Introduction In the past year, the use of large language models (LLMs) has generated significant interest and excitement because of their potential to revolutionise various fields, including medical education for aspiring physicians. Although medical students undergo a demanding educational process to become competent health care professionals, the emergence of LLMs presents a promising solution to challenges like information overload, time constraints and pressure on clinical educators. However, integrating LLMs into medical education raises critical concerns and challenges for educators, professionals and students. This systematic review aims to explore LLM applications in medical education, specifically their impact on medical students' learning experiences. Methods A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science and Embase for articles discussing the applications of LLMs in medical education using selected keywords related to LLMs and medical education, from the time of ChatGPT's debut until February 2024. Only articles available in full text or English were reviewed. The credibility of each study was critically appraised by two independent reviewers. Results The systematic review identified 166 studies, of which 40 were found by review to be relevant to the study. Among the 40 relevant studies, key themes included LLM capabilities, benefits such as personalised learning and challenges regarding content accuracy. Importantly, 42.5% of these studies specifically evaluated LLMs in a novel way, including ChatGPT, in contexts such as medical exams and clinical/biomedical information, highlighting their potential in replicating human‐level performance in medical knowledge. The remaining studies broadly discussed the prospective role of LLMs in medical education, reflecting a keen interest in their future potential despite current constraints. Conclusions The responsible implementation of LLMs in medical education offers a promising opportunity to enhance learning experiences. However, ensuring information accuracy, emphasising skill‐building and maintaining ethical safeguards are crucial. Continuous critical evaluation and interdisciplinary collaboration are essential for the appropriate integration of LLMs in medical education.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
daboluo完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
memem1发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
童念之发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
算我运气好完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
nujabes完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
健壮的友安完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
KK完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
10秒前
笑点低的惊蛰完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
13秒前
白马非马发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
15秒前
充电宝应助genhaoyi采纳,获得10
16秒前
谷蓝完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
剑十三发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
huqing发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
妃妃完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
脑洞疼应助农大彭于晏采纳,获得10
21秒前
21秒前
Tabby完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
22秒前
聪明山芙发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
zhuhaot发布了新的文献求助50
26秒前
白马非马完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
zhj完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
SSSSYYYY完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
酷酷宛筠应助聪明山芙采纳,获得10
27秒前
CMC完成签到,获得积分20
28秒前
zs发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
wj发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
32秒前
NexusExplorer应助fransiccarey采纳,获得10
33秒前
春夏秋冬完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
shining完成签到 ,获得积分10
38秒前
Gabvin完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
震动的幻枫完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
高分求助中
请在求助之前详细阅读求助说明!!!! 20000
One Man Talking: Selected Essays of Shao Xunmei, 1929–1939 1000
The Three Stars Each: The Astrolabes and Related Texts 900
Yuwu Song, Biographical Dictionary of the People's Republic of China 700
[Lambert-Eaton syndrome without calcium channel autoantibodies] 520
Pressing the Fight: Print, Propaganda, and the Cold War 500
Bernd Ziesemer - Maos deutscher Topagent: Wie China die Bundesrepublik eroberte 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2471116
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2137881
关于积分的说明 5447448
捐赠科研通 1861761
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 925931
版权声明 562740
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 495278