Overview of Systematic Reviews of ICIs in NSCLC With EGFR, ALK, ROS1, and RET Actionable Driver Mutations

The effectiveness and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer with EGFR, ALK, ROS1, or RET actionable driver mutations or chromosomal rearrangements is currently uncertain. We assessed the efficacy and safety of ICIs in patients with this condition whose disease did not respond well to previous chemotherapy. We reviewed 13 systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The quality assessment of these reviews revealed critical methodological flaws. All 13 systematic reviews focused on survival and progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with non–small cell lung cancer and EGFR gene mutations. The systematic reviews generally considered the same set of 4 clinical trials and did not report on other outcomes or patient groups, except for 1 review that looked at patients with different levels of anti-PD-L1 expression. We found no evidence on the efficacy and safety of ICIs in patients with ALK, ROS1, or RET mutations. Overall, the systematic reviews concluded that using ICIs alone, as a second-line therapy or beyond, does not significantly improve overall survival (OS) and PFS compared to chemotherapy in patients with non–small cell lung cancer with EGFR gene mutations. No conclusions can be made regarding the benefits of ICIs in patients with EGFR mutations based on histology or high antiprogrammed death-ligand 1 antibody expression levels. The safety of ICIs in patients with EGFR, ALK, ROS1, or RET actionable driver mutations could not be assessed because of the lack of evidence provided in the included systematic reviews.