冲程(发动机)
医学
比例(比率)
巴氏指数
可靠性(半导体)
心理干预
同种类的
物理医学与康复
物理疗法
有效性
日常生活活动
心理测量学
临床心理学
精神科
地图学
机械工程
功率(物理)
物理
量子力学
工程类
热力学
地理
作者
L D'Olhaberriague,Irene Litvan,Panayiotis Mitsias,Harry H. Mansbach
出处
期刊:Stroke
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:1996-12-01
卷期号:27 (12): 2331-2336
被引量:174
标识
DOI:10.1161/01.str.27.12.2331
摘要
Background The emergence of prophylactic and therapeutic interventions in stroke has been accompanied by the widespread use of stroke classifications and scales that measure deficit (stroke scales) or resulting long-term handicap (handicap and disability scales). Although the accuracy of some scales and classifications has been studied, there is no updated systematic review appraising all of them. Review We reviewed the literature and selected 21 studies on classifications and scales. The International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, achieved the highest interobserver agreement among seven stroke classifications. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, the Canadian Neurological Scale, and the European Stroke Scale had the highest reliability across items among nine stroke scales. The Barthel Index was the most reliable disability scale. Conclusions The identification of the most reliable stroke classifications and scales should encourage their use in selection of homogeneous populations of patients for clinical research studies and to improve communication among scientists. Further research is needed to investigate neglected aspects of the neurological examination and the validity of stroke classifications.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI