Current Evidence on Celecoxib Safety in the Management of Chronic Musculoskeletal Conditions: An Umbrella Review

医学 塞来昔布 药物治疗 重症监护医学 药理学 内科学
作者
Charlotte Beaudart,Christian Brabant,Majed S. Alokail,Jean-Yves Reginster,Olivier Bruyère
出处
期刊:Drugs [Adis, Springer Healthcare]
标识
DOI:10.1007/s40265-025-02234-5
摘要

Our objective was to systematically synthesize and evaluate the existing evidence from meta-syntheses (systematic reviews and meta-analyses) reporting on the safety of celecoxib in adults with chronic musculoskeletal disorders. We conducted a comprehensive literature search in November 2024 across MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, and Scopus databases, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines for umbrella reviews. Only systematic reviews and meta-analyses involving celecoxib safety in osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis were included. We assessed the risk of bias using the AMSTAR-2 tool and graded the certainty of evidence using GRADE. Of 2294 retrieved records, 16 systematic reviews based on randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria (14 of 16 were rated as critically low quality). Celecoxib was consistently associated with a lower risk of gastroduodenal ulcers than were non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and some studies also reported fewer gastrointestinal complaints and serious events with celecoxib than with non-selective NSAIDs. Cardiovascular safety outcomes were generally similar to those with non-selective NSAIDs, although one meta-analysis showed a lower risk of cardiovascular mortality with celecoxib. Compared with placebo or non-selective NSAIDs, celecoxib did not increase the risk of renal dysfunction or elevated creatinine and may be associated with fewer renal adverse events. Evidence on all-cause mortality was limited and inconsistent, but one study suggested a lower risk than with non-selective NSAIDs. Celecoxib appears to offer better gastrointestinal safety than non-selective NSAIDs. Although data on cardiovascular, renal, and mortality outcomes suggest possible advantages, the evidence remains limited and of low certainty. Moreover, some real-world evidence raises concerns in specific high-risk populations. Future research should integrate data from both randomized trials and observational studies to better inform long-term safety assessments and guide individualized treatment decisions.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
科研通AI5应助传统的雁枫采纳,获得10
2秒前
阿关完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
xun发布了新的文献求助100
2秒前
4秒前
4秒前
阿波卡利斯完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
汉堡包应助口外彭于晏采纳,获得30
4秒前
相识发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
CipherSage应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
梵高的向日葵完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
酷波er应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
科目三应助欣喜的秋莲采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
挖掘机应助科研通管家采纳,获得200
6秒前
Jasper应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
6秒前
丘比特应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
Jasper应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
Ava应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
斯文败类应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
烟花应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
传奇3应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
所所应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
周海涛发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
guozizi发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
liu完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
纹银完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
轻松凡英完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
Carrie完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
12秒前
如意蚂蚁完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
古铜完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
传统的雁枫完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
udbjn123发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
科研通AI6应助王钢铁采纳,获得10
20秒前
顾矜应助yc采纳,获得10
21秒前
陈瑞滢完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
计划经济时代的工厂管理与工人状况(1949-1966)——以郑州市国营工厂为例 500
Sociologies et cosmopolitisme méthodologique 400
Why America Can't Retrench (And How it Might) 400
Another look at Archaeopteryx as the oldest bird 390
创造互补优势国外有人/无人协同解析 300
The Great Psychology Delusion 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 催化作用 遗传学 冶金 电极 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4645135
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4035700
关于积分的说明 12481842
捐赠科研通 3724480
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2055630
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1086643
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 968199