Rejecting impulsivity as a psychological construct: A theoretical, empirical, and sociocultural argument.

冲动性 心理学 构造(python库) 认知心理学 心理信息 社会文化进化 发展心理学 梅德林 政治学 人类学 计算机科学 社会学 程序设计语言 法学
作者
Justin C. Strickland,Matthew W. Johnson
出处
期刊:Psychological Review [American Psychological Association]
卷期号:128 (2): 336-361 被引量:218
标识
DOI:10.1037/rev0000263
摘要

We demonstrate through theoretical, empirical, and sociocultural evidence that the concept of impulsivity fails the basic requirements of a psychological construct and should be rejected as such. Impulsivity (or impulsiveness) currently holds a central place in psychological theory, research, and clinical practice and is considered a multifaceted concept. However, impulsivity falls short of the theoretical specifications for hypothetical constructs by having meaning that is not compatible with psychometric, neuroscience, and clinical data. Psychometric findings indicate that impulsive traits and behaviors (e.g., response inhibition, delay discounting) are largely uncorrelated and fail to load onto a single, superordinate latent variable. Modern neuroscience has also failed to identify a specific and central neurobehavioral mechanism underlying impulsive behaviors and instead has found separate neurochemical systems and loci that contribute to a variety of impulsivity types. Clinically, these different impulsivity types show diverging and distinct pathways and processes relating to behavioral and psychosocial health. The predictive validity and sensitivity of impulsivity measures to pharmacological, behavioral, and cognitive interventions also vary based on the impulsivity type evaluated and clinical condition examined. Conflation of distinct personality and behavioral mechanisms under a single umbrella of impulsivity ultimately increases the likelihood of misunderstanding at a sociocultural level and facilitates misled hypothesizing and artificial inconsistencies for clinical translation. We strongly recommend that, based on this comprehensive evidence, psychological scientists and neuroscientists reject the language of impulsivity in favor of a specific focus on the several well-defined and empirically supported factors that impulsivity is purported to cover. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
科研通AI6.1应助cijing采纳,获得10
刚刚
完美世界应助莫若以明采纳,获得10
刚刚
苹果小凡应助123采纳,获得30
刚刚
科研通AI6.2应助韶华采纳,获得10
1秒前
拉长的凝荷完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
kkk发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
梁梁完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
大方的听露完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
科研通AI6.2应助puqiu采纳,获得10
5秒前
sandwich完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
淡淡十三发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
yyyyy发布了新的文献求助20
8秒前
kk完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
渔婆发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
wanghuhu完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
ws完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
佳烨发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
脑洞疼应助大方的听露采纳,获得10
11秒前
Ava应助qq星采纳,获得10
12秒前
14秒前
王国向完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
桐桐应助月亮上的猫采纳,获得10
15秒前
加油发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
CodeCraft应助kkk采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
科研通AI6.2应助cijing采纳,获得10
16秒前
17秒前
18秒前
18秒前
zz完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
爆米花应助莫若以明采纳,获得10
19秒前
乐乐应助落卿采纳,获得10
19秒前
19秒前
静水流深发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
高分求助中
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 1234
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Petrology and Plate Tectonics,2025 400
Burger's Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery 400
New directions for experimental lessons in science teaching: Myth, Mystery, Necessity? by Emily K. da Silva Cunha Souto (Author), Flávia Lins Silva (Author) 333
Scientific experimentation in the classroom: Comparison between genetic-Socratic-exemplary teaching and workshop teaching by Ingrid Hofer (Author) 333
Programming for Chemical Engineers Using C, C++, and MATLAB 320
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6722664
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8458656
关于积分的说明 18058514
捐赠科研通 5975581
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2996756
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1972934
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1927133