复合肌肉动作电位
医学
超声波
体内
麻醉
离体
局部麻醉剂
坐骨神经
电生理学
曲线下面积
延迟(音频)
生物医学工程
药理学
内科学
放射科
生物
电气工程
生物技术
工程类
作者
Thomas A. Anderson,Jorge Delgado,Sharon Sun,Negin Behzadian,José G. Vilches-Moure,Robert B. Szlavik,Kim Butts Pauly,David C. Yeomans
标识
DOI:10.1136/rapm-2021-103115
摘要
Background In animal models, focused ultrasound can reversibly or permanently inhibit nerve conduction, suggesting a potential role in managing pain. We hypothesized focused ultrasound’s effects on action potential parameters may be similar to those of local anesthetics. Methods In an ex vivo rat sciatic nerve model, action potential amplitude, area under the curve, latency to 10% peak, latency to 100% peak, rate of rise, and half peak width changes were assessed after separately applying increasing focused ultrasound pressures or concentrations of bupivacaine and ropivacaine. Focused ultrasound’s effects on nerve structure were examined histologically. Results Increasing focused ultrasound pressures decreased action potential amplitude, area under the curve, and rate of rise, increased latency to 10% peak, and did not change latency to 100% peak or half peak width. Increasing local anesthetic concentrations decreased action potential amplitude, area under the curve, and rate of rise and increased latency to 10% peak, latency to 100% peak, and half peak width. At the highest focused ultrasound pressures, nerve architecture was altered compared with controls. Discussion While some action potential parameters were altered comparably by focused ultrasound and local anesthetics, there were small but notable differences. It is not evident if these differences may lead to differences in clinical pain effects when focused ultrasound is applied in vivo or if focused ultrasound pressures that result in clinically relevant changes damage nerve structures. Given the potential advantages of a non-invasive technique for managing pain conditions, further investigation may be warranted in an in vivo pain model.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI