Transforaminal vs Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 for Degenerative Spine Disease

医学 前凸 腰椎 退行性椎间盘病 外科 减压 腰椎 优势比 脊柱融合术 射线照相术 内科学
作者
Alan H. Daniels,Mohammad Daher,Joseph E. Nassar,Sleiman Haddad,Louis Boissière,Richard K. Hurley,William F. Lavelle,Peter G. Passias,Bassel G. Diebo,Amer Sebaaly
出处
期刊:Spine [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1097/brs.0000000000005315
摘要

Study Design. Meta-Analysis Objective. This meta-analysis will compare transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) to Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) at L5-S1 in lumbar degenerative spine diseases (DSD). Background. Interbody device placement is indicated for alignment correction, sustaining decompression, achieving fusion, and is an effective and widely performed surgical treatment for lumbar DSD. ALIF and TLIF are the two most commonly performed approaches for the management of DSD at L5-S1. Methods. Following the PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were accessed and explored until December 2024. The extracted data consisted of complications, reoperations, surgery-related parameters, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and post-operative radiographic parameters. Across all studies, mean differences (MD) with 95% CI were used for continuous data while odds ratio (OR) was utilized for dichotomous data. Results. Nine retrospective articles were included in the meta-analysis, including 1292 patients, with 694 in the TLIF group and 598 in the ALIF group. Patients undergoing TLIF were found to have higher rates of overall complications (OR=1.66; P =0.005) and reoperations (OR=5.92; P =0.03; although 2 studies were included in this analysis), shorter operative time in MIS TLIF compared to ALIF (MD=-47.00; P <0.001), more blood loss in open TLIF compared to ALIF (MD=135.05; P <0.001), and less improvement in lumbar lordosis and segmental lordosis (MD=-3.48; P =0.03; MD=-5.86; P <0.001). However, there was no difference in PROMs between the 2 groups. Conclusion. Patients undergoing TLIF at L5-S1 for their DSD, compared to ALIF, had higher rates of complications and reoperations, greater blood loss, and less improvement in sagittal alignment. These results highlight the efficacy, power, and safety of ALIF and its benefits in restoring alignment, which may optimize long-term outcomes.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
结实乐曲发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
魏一刀完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
秃秃完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
lenon完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
万能图书馆应助zw132采纳,获得10
4秒前
王狗若关注了科研通微信公众号
4秒前
胡辣椒麻鸡完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
科研通AI5应助gtflbk采纳,获得10
4秒前
邱海华发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
abcdefg完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
Elanie完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
汪洋一叶完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
可爱的函函应助一朵巴巴采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
Wang完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
阿郎发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
Poisomber发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
老驴拉磨完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
虚幻的凤完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
唐浩星发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
Leon完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
绮烟完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
ZEB发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
闻塔完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
Jasper应助阿郎采纳,获得10
12秒前
Lucas应助阿郎采纳,获得10
12秒前
852应助慧慧吴采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
科研通AI6应助__采纳,获得10
13秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助20
13秒前
高分求助中
Comprehensive Toxicology Fourth Edition 24000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
LRZ Gitlab附件(3D Matching of TerraSAR-X Derived Ground Control Points to Mobile Mapping Data 附件) 2000
Pipeline and riser loss of containment 2001 - 2020 (PARLOC 2020) 1000
World Nuclear Fuel Report: Global Scenarios for Demand and Supply Availability 2025-2040 800
Handbook of Social and Emotional Learning 800
The Social Work Ethics Casebook(2nd,Frederic G. R) 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5131642
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4333372
关于积分的说明 13500477
捐赠科研通 4170310
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2286231
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1287130
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1228164