医学
肾脏替代疗法
病危
机械通风
随机对照试验
中止
重症监护室
急性肾损伤
重症监护医学
血管内容积状态
麻醉
内科学
血流动力学
作者
Farin Rashid Farokhi,Effat Kalateh,Shadi Shafaghi,Antoine Schneider,Seyed Mehdi Mortazavi,Hamidreza Jamaati,Seyed Mohammad Reza Hashemian
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.154146
摘要
Bioimpedance vector analysis (BIVA) has been suggested as a valuable tool in assessing volume status in critically ill patients. However, its effectiveness in guiding fluid removal by continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has not been evaluated.In this randomized controlled trial, 65 critically ill patients receiving CRRT were allocated on a 1:1 ratio to have UF prescribed and adjusted using BIVA fluid assessment in the intervention group (32 patients) or conventional clinical parameters (33 patients). The primary outcome was the lean body mass (LBM) water content at CRRT discontinuation, and the secondary outcomes included the mortality rate, urinary output, the duration of ventilation support, and ICU stay.The study group was associated with a lower water content of LBM (80.7 ± 9.4 vs. 85.9 ± 10.4%; p < 0.05), and a higher mean UF-rate and urinary output (1.5 ± 0.8 vs. 1.2 ± 0.5 ml/kg/h and 0.9 ± 0.9 vs 0.5 ± 0.6 ml/kg/h, both: p < 0.05). The mortality rate, the length of ICU stay, and ventilation support duration were similar.BIVA guided UF prescription may be associated with a lower rate of fluid overload. Larger studies are required to evaluate its impact on patients' outcomes.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI