医学
应激性溃疡
蛛网膜下腔出血
入射(几何)
上消化道出血
机械通风
回顾性队列研究
神经重症监护
内科学
神经学
观察研究
胃肠道出血
重症监护室
重症监护医学
内窥镜检查
物理
光学
精神科
作者
Dina Ali,Megan E. Barra,Joseph R. Blunck,Gretchen M. Brophy,Caitlin S. Brown,Meghan M. Caylor,Sarah L. Clark,David Hensler,Mathew Jones,Amanda Lamer-Rosen,Melissa Levesque,Leana Mahmoud,Sherif Hanafy Mahmoud,Casey C. May,Keith Nguyen,Nicholas Panos,Christina Roels,Justin Shewmaker,Keaton S. Smetana,Jessica Traeger
标识
DOI:10.1007/s12028-020-01137-5
摘要
Stress-related mucosal bleeding (SRMB) occurs in approximately 2–4% of critically ill patients. Patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) have a (diffuse) space-occupying lesion, are critically ill, often require mechanical ventilation, and frequently receive anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy after aneurysm embolization, all of which may be risk factors for SRMB. However, no studies have evaluated SRMB in patients with aSAH. Aims of the study were to determine the incidence of SRMB in aSAH patients, evaluate the effect of acid suppression on SRMB, and identify specific risk factors for SRMB.
This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational study conducted across 17 centers. Each center reviewed up to 50 of the most recent cases of aSAH. Patients with length of stay (LOS) < 48 h or active GI bleeding on admission were excluded. Variables related to demographics, aSAH severity, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, provision of SRMB prophylaxis, adverse events, intensive care unit (ICU), and hospital LOS were collected for the first 21 days of admission or until hospital discharge, whichever came first. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. A multivariate logistic regression modeling was utilized to examine the relationship between specific risk factors and the incidence of clinically important GI bleeding in patients with aSAH.
A total of 627 patients were included. The overall incidence of clinically important GI bleeding was 4.9%. Of the patients with clinically important GI bleeding, 19 (61%) received pharmacologic prophylaxis prior to evidence of GI bleeding, while 12 (39%) were not on pharmacologic prophylaxis at the onset of GI bleeding. Patients who received an acid suppressant agent were less likely to experience GI bleeding than patients who did not receive pharmacologic prophylaxis prior to evidence of bleeding (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18–0.83). The multivariate regression analysis identified any instance of elevated intracranial pressure, creatinine clearance 48 h), creatinine clearance < 60 ml/min, presence of coagulopathy, elevation of intracranial pressure, and cerebral vasospasm. Further prospective research is needed to confirm this observation within this patient population.