医学
导管
外科
固定(群体遗传学)
麻醉
随机对照试验
人口
环境卫生
作者
Peter M. Odor,Sohail Bampoe,John Hayward,Irina Chis Ster,Elizabeth Evans
出处
期刊:Anaesthesia
[Wiley]
日期:2015-12-29
卷期号:71 (3): 298-305
被引量:17
摘要
Summary This randomised controlled trial investigated the efficacy of Epi‐Fix ™ , LockIt Plus ® and Tegaderm ™ as fixation devices for intrapartum epidural catheters. One hundred and sixty‐five women requesting intrapartum epidural analgesia were randomised to receive different fixation devices to secure their epidural catheter. The amount of epidural catheter migration (measured to the nearest 0.5 cm) was analysed for three devices: Epi‐Fix (n = 55); LockIt Plus (n = 54); and Tegaderm dressing (n = 51). Median ( IQR [range]) catheter migration for Epi‐Fix was 1.0 cm (0.0–2.0 [−2.0 to 9.5]), vs 0.0 cm (0.0–0.5 [−1.0 to 5.5]) for LockIt Plus and 0.5 cm (0.0–1.8 [−1.5 to 8.0]) for Tegaderm (p = 0.003). Thirty‐eight (69.1%) epidural catheters secured with Epi‐Fix migrated < 2.0 cm, compared with 49 (90.7%) with LockIt Plus and 40 (78.4%) with Tegaderm. Sixteen epidural catheters required resiting due to failure of analgesia of which 12 (75.0%) occurred in patients with epidural catheters that had migrated ≥ 2.0 cm. This study shows that intrapartum epidural catheters secured with the LockIt Plus device exhibit less catheter migration compared with fixation with Epi‐Fix and Tegaderm.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI