Effects of Positive Airway Pressure Therapy on Glycemic Variability in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and OSA

Background Glycemic variability is associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes independent of glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels. Given the conflicting evidence on the effect of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy for OSA on HbA1c, elucidating its effect on glycemic variability has value. Research Question Does the use of PAP therapy for OSA improve glycemic variability in patients with type 2 diabetes? Study Design and Methods A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 184 patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate-to-severe OSA. Participants received either 3 months of PAP therapy with lifestyle counseling or lifestyle counseling alone. End points included the SD of glucose levels along with other metrics derived from continuous glucose monitoring and self-monitoring of blood glucose. Results No differences were noted in either primary or secondary continuous glucose monitoring end points between the two groups. Average use of PAP therapy was 5.4 h/night (SD, 1.6). Exploratory analyses by sex showed significant differences in the primary and secondary outcomes. In women, PAP therapy was associated with improvement in the SD of glucose levels, with a mean difference in change between intervention and control groups of 3.5 mg/dL (P = .02). PAP therapy was also associated with lower postdinner and bedtime glucose levels: 20.1 mg/dL (P < .01) and 34.6 mg/dL (P < .01), respectively. Interpretation PAP therapy did not improve glycemic control or variability in patients with moderate-to-severe OSA and type 2 diabetes. Exploratory analyses suggested that PAP therapy may improve glucose variability in women. Postdinner and bedtime glucose levels were higher in those who did not receive PAP therapy. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02454153; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov Glycemic variability is associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes independent of glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels. Given the conflicting evidence on the effect of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy for OSA on HbA1c, elucidating its effect on glycemic variability has value. Does the use of PAP therapy for OSA improve glycemic variability in patients with type 2 diabetes? A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 184 patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate-to-severe OSA. Participants received either 3 months of PAP therapy with lifestyle counseling or lifestyle counseling alone. End points included the SD of glucose levels along with other metrics derived from continuous glucose monitoring and self-monitoring of blood glucose. No differences were noted in either primary or secondary continuous glucose monitoring end points between the two groups. Average use of PAP therapy was 5.4 h/night (SD, 1.6). Exploratory analyses by sex showed significant differences in the primary and secondary outcomes. In women, PAP therapy was associated with improvement in the SD of glucose levels, with a mean difference in change between intervention and control groups of 3.5 mg/dL (P = .02). PAP therapy was also associated with lower postdinner and bedtime glucose levels: 20.1 mg/dL (P < .01) and 34.6 mg/dL (P < .01), respectively. PAP therapy did not improve glycemic control or variability in patients with moderate-to-severe OSA and type 2 diabetes. Exploratory analyses suggested that PAP therapy may improve glucose variability in women. Postdinner and bedtime glucose levels were higher in those who did not receive PAP therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02454153; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov