Radiology Residents’ Independent Diagnosis of Appendicitis Using 2-mSv Computed Tomography: A Secondary Analysis of a Large Pragmatic Randomized Trial

医学 计算机断层摄影术 阑尾炎 置信区间 放射科 随机对照试验 有效剂量(辐射) 核医学 内科学 普通外科
作者
Jungheum Cho,Hae Young Kim,Seungjae Lee,Ji Hoon Park,Kyoung Ho Lee
出处
期刊:Korean Journal of Radiology [Korean Society of Radiology]
卷期号:24 (6): 529-529 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.3348/kjr.2023.0015
摘要

To compare the diagnostic performance and clinical outcomes of 2-mSv computed tomography (CT) and conventional-dose CT (CDCT), following radiology residents' interpretation of CT examinations for suspected appendicitis.Altogether, 3074 patients with suspected appendicitis aged 15-44 years (28 ± 9 years, 1672 females) from 20 hospitals were randomly assigned to the 2-mSv CT (n = 1535) or CDCT (n = 1539) groups in a pragmatic trial from December 2013 and August 2016. Overall, 107 radiology residents participated in the trial as readers in the form of daily practice after online training for 2-mSv CT. They made preliminary CT reports, which were later finalized by attending radiologists via addendum reports, for 640 and 657 patients in the 2-mSv CT and CDCT groups, respectively. We compared the diagnostic performance of the residents, discrepancies between preliminary and addendum reports, and clinical outcomes between the two groups.Patient characteristics were similar between the 640 and 657 patients. Residents' diagnostic performance was not significantly different between the 2-mSv CT and CDCT groups, with a sensitivity of 96.0% and 97.1%, respectively (difference [95% confidence interval {CI}], -1.1% [-4.9%, 2.6%]; P = 0.69) and specificity of 93.2% and 93.1%, respectively (0.1% [-3.6%, 3.7%]; P > 0.99). The 2-mSv CT and CDCT groups did not significantly differ in discrepancies between the preliminary and addendum reports regarding the presence of appendicitis (3.3% vs. 5.2%; -1.9% [-4.2%, 0.4%]; P = 0.12) and alternative diagnosis (5.5% vs. 6.4%; -0.9% [-3.6%, 1.8%]; P = 0.56). The rates of perforated appendicitis (12.0% vs. 12.6%; -0.6% [-4.3%, 3.1%]; P = 0.81) and negative appendectomies (1.9% vs. 1.1%; 0.8% [-0.7%, 2.3%]; P = 0.33) were not significantly different between the two groups.Diagnostic performance and clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the 2-mSv CT and CDCT groups following radiology residents' CT readings for suspected appendicitis.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
Jennie发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Zhe完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
乐乐应助wusuowei采纳,获得10
2秒前
XD824发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
打打应助zhl采纳,获得10
3秒前
mailik完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
跳跃的访琴完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
冷静夜蕾发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
寒枫发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
23完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
丘比特应助xmut采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
didilvlv发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
sunny完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
baiyang发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
小二郎应助cavitydynamics采纳,获得10
12秒前
隔壁小王发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
zizizizi发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
15秒前
秋风应助小白采纳,获得10
15秒前
Keturah完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
Alec发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
17秒前
17秒前
18秒前
清爽画板完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
忧心的康发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
zhl发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
SciGPT应助细腻朋友采纳,获得10
20秒前
成就魂幽完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
HYDROLYSE ACIDE DE QUELQUES DIOXASPIROCYCLANES 1314
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 700
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7742965
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9291174
关于积分的说明 20206243
捐赠科研通 7321549
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3307232
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2459131
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2317851