已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Probability of Major Depression Classification Based on the SCID, CIDI, and MINI Diagnostic Interviews: A Synthesis of Three Individual Participant Data Meta-Analyses

CIDI公司 萧条(经济学) 优势比 置信区间 可能性 医学 荟萃分析 精神科 心理学 临床心理学 逻辑回归 共病 内科学 全国共病调查 宏观经济学 经济
作者
Yin Wu,Brooke Levis,John P. A. Ioannidis,Andrea Benedetti,Brett D. Thombs
出处
期刊:Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics [Karger Publishers]
卷期号:90 (1): 28-40 被引量:38
标识
DOI:10.1159/000509283
摘要

INTRODUCTION: Three previous individual participant data meta-analyses (IPDMAs) reported that, compared to the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM (SCID), alternative reference standards, primarily the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), tended to misclassify major depression status, when controlling for depression symptom severity. However, there was an important lack of precision in the results. OBJECTIVE: To compare the odds of the major depression classification based on the SCID, CIDI, and MINI. METHODS: We included and standardized data from 3 IPDMA databases. For each IPDMA, separately, we fitted binomial generalized linear mixed models to compare the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of major depression classification, controlling for symptom severity and characteristics of participants, and the interaction between interview and symptom severity. Next, we synthesized results using a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: In total, 69,405 participants (7,574 [11%] with major depression) from 212 studies were included. Controlling for symptom severity and participant characteristics, the MINI (74 studies; 25,749 participants) classified major depression more often than the SCID (108 studies; 21,953 participants; aOR 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-1.92]). Classification odds for the CIDI (30 studies; 21,703 participants) and the SCID did not differ overall (aOR 1.19; 95% CI 0.79-1.75); however, as screening scores increased, the aOR increased less for the CIDI than the SCID (interaction aOR 0.64; 95% CI 0.52-0.80). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the SCID, the MINI classified major depression more often. The odds of the depression classification with the CIDI increased less as symptom levels increased. Interpretation of research that uses diagnostic interviews to classify depression should consider the interview characteristics.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
典雅怜容发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
Owen应助呵呵贺哈采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
太叔笑蓝完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
凡松完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
慕青应助qcwindchasing采纳,获得10
4秒前
水水水发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
桃不掉了发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
欣喜毛巾完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
所所应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
思源应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
Lucas应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
852应助布拉修采纳,获得10
8秒前
xuz应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
赘婿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
molihuakai应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
慕青应助www采纳,获得30
8秒前
华仔应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
无情修杰发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
orixero应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
GingerF应助科研通管家采纳,获得50
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
桐桐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
www完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
xue完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
lili发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
香菜头完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
乐乐应助Rain采纳,获得10
14秒前
xiaoliang发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
坚持完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
2016 Venous Blood Study (VBS) (Final V3.0) 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
The Effective Clinical Neurologist 3ed 500
The Great Hymn to Šamaš 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7699845
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9259079
关于积分的说明 20017844
捐赠科研通 7274955
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3293617
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2449012
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2299932