货币化
计算机科学
自相残杀
盈利能力指数
个性化
客户群
特征(语言学)
机器学习
适应性学习
过程(计算)
生成语法
人工智能
服务(商务)
强化学习
更安全的
在实践中学习
软件
业务
生成模型
营销
网络效应
早期采用者
危害
学习效果
产品(数学)
模块化设计
代理(哲学)
作者
Yinliang Tan,Ling Zhong,Yi Lu,Jiajia Nie
标识
DOI:10.1287/isre.2025.2140
摘要
Generative AI firms increasingly rely on freemium strategies, offering a basic service at no charge while charging for a more capable version. Unlike conventional digital products, generative AI systems can improve through user interactions, making free users a potential source of valuable learning data. Using an analytical model, this study shows that freemium is not always the most profitable strategy. Free access can expand the user base and accelerate AI adaptive learning, but it can also cannibalize paid demand and create substantial service costs. More effective adaptive learning does not necessarily make freemium more attractive; under some conditions, the firm earns more by offering only a paid version at a lower price. When freemium is used, a moderate capability gap between free and premium versions can be more profitable than making the free tier either too limited or too close to the premium product. Managers should evaluate learning benefits alongside service costs, market coverage, and premium cannibalization. Policymakers should also avoid assuming that free access automatically improves consumer welfare, because capability gains may allow firms to raise premium prices.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI