医学
逐渐变细
类阿片
麻醉
药方
内科学
重症监护医学
梅德林
药品管理局
芬太尼
药品
心脏病学
临床试验
急诊医学
随机对照试验
阿片类药物滥用
作者
Beth D. Darnall,Luzmercy Perez,Ming‐Chih Jeffrey Kao,Kate R. Lorig,Aram S. Mardian,Pamela Dru Flood,Ting Pun,Eric R. Hanson,William G. Brose,Chwen-Yuen A. Chen,Matthias Cheung,Luana Colloca,Korina De Bruyne,Naomi Edelson,Eileen Kim,Mark P. McGovern,Nathaniel Moore,Bruce D Nicholson,Joel Porter,Heather Poupore‐King
标识
DOI:10.7326/annals-25-04784
摘要
BACKGROUND: Evidence is needed on tapering long-term prescription opioids in outpatient settings. OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the effectiveness of 3 opioid tapering and pain control strategies (July 2018 to November 2023). DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03445988). SETTING: 11 U.S. sites. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with pain for at least 6 months receiving a morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) of 10 or higher for at least 3 months without moderate or severe opioid use disorder. INTERVENTION: Patient-centered opioid tapering with close monitoring and electronic supports was administered as taper only, taper plus cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain (pain-CBT), or taper plus a chronic pain self-management program (CPSMP). MEASUREMENTS: Taper success (primary outcome) was either an MEDD decrease of at least 50% with no increased pain or no MEDD increase with decreased pain intensity. RESULTS: A total of 562 participants were randomly assigned (191 taper only, 203 taper plus pain-CBT, 168 taper plus CPSMP). The taper success rate was 50.9% (95% CI, 42.9% to 58.9%) for taper only, 48.6% (CI, 41.0% to 56.2%) for taper plus pain-CBT, and 44.5% (CI, 36.0% to 53.3%) for taper plus CPSMP. Tapering with pain-CBT or CPSMP provided no benefit in taper success over taper only (taper plus pain-CBT vs. taper only, -2.4 percentage points [CI, -11.9 to 7.2 percentage points]; taper plus CPSMP vs. taper only, -5.2 percentage points [CI, -15.3 to 4.8 percentage points]). Study-related adverse event risk (including opioid withdrawal symptoms) was highest in the taper only group (126 of 191 [66%]) compared with taper plus pain-CBT (109 of 203 [54%]) and taper plus CPSMP (108 of 168 [64%]). LIMITATION: Challenges related to COVID-19 reduced the sample size and made treatment groups imbalanced; low behavioral treatment attendance and losses to follow-up could have limited effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Adding CBT or self-management to patient-centered opioid tapering did not improve taper success at 12 months, although CBT may reduce adverse effects (including opioid withdrawal symptoms). PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI