医学
放射治疗
吞咽
鼻咽癌
磁共振成像
置信区间
外科
放射科
危险系数
随机对照试验
淋巴结
外照射放疗
意向治疗分析
临床终点
不利影响
存活率
优势比
生活质量(医疗保健)
临床试验
荟萃分析
生存分析
不良事件通用术语标准
诱导化疗
放化疗
喉
人口
作者
Shun-Xin Wang,Ya-Lan Tao,Tian-Sheng Gao,Ning Zhang,Guan-Qun Zhou,Fang-Yun Xie,Yuan Zhang,Rui Guo,Yi Yang,Y. Li,Shao-Qiang Liang,Y F Zeng,Lu Lin,Wen-Fei Li,Xu Liu,Shan Xu,Yu-Pei Chen,Jia-Wei Lv,Li-Zhi Liu,Hao-Jiang Li
出处
期刊:
日期:2026-03-31
卷期号:392: e086050-e086050
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmj-2025-086050
摘要
Abstract Objective To determine the pre-specified long term efficacy (survival and swallowing function) and safety of medial retropharyngeal lymph node (MRLN) region sparing radiotherapy for non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Design Pre-specified five year analysis of an open label, non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised phase 3 trial. Setting Three Chinese medical centres between 20 November 2017 and 3 December 2018. Participants Adults (18-65 years) with untreated, non-keratinising, non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma without MRLN involvement. Interventions Eligible patients were randomised (1:1; block size of four) to MRLN sparing radiotherapy or standard radiotherapy. Randomisation was stratified by institution and treatment modality (radiotherapy alone, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, or induction chemotherapy plus radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy). Main outcome measures The primary outcome was local relapse-free survival. The three year local relapse-free survival to assess the non-inferiority, with a margin of 8%, of MRLN sparing radiotherapy compared with standard radiotherapy has been reported previously. This updated report focuses on five year survival, toxicity, and quality of life. Additionally, a videofluoroscopic swallowing study and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements of pharyngeal contractors were used as objective measures of dysphagia Results This trial enrolled 285 patients in the MRLN sparing group and 283 patients in the standard group. At a median follow-up of 70 months, the MRLN sparing and standard groups had similar five year local relapse-free survival (89.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 85% to 92%) versus 90.6% (87% to 94%); stratified hazard ratio 1.03 (95% CI 0.61 to 1.74); P=0.90) and overall survival (89.2% (85% to 93%) versus 90.3% (87% to 94%); stratified hazard ratio 1.06 (0.68 to 1.68); P=0.79). Updated safety profiles of the MRLN sparing group showed a lower rate of grade ≥1 dysphagia (45/206 (22%) v 70/216 (32%); P=0.01) and grade ≥2 dry mouth (33/206 (16%) v 55/216 (25%); P=0.02) and enhanced swallowing related quality of life (mean difference –11.9; P<0.001). Videofluoroscopy showed a lower prevalence of vallecular residue (49/66 (74%) v 62/62 (100%); P<0.001), pyriform sinus residue (32/66 (48%) v 45/62 (73%); P=0.01), coating of pharyngeal wall (7/66 (11%) v 17/62 (27%); P=0.01), pharyngeal transit time >1.0 s (1/66 (2%) v 7/62 (11%); P=0.03), and aspiration (8/66 (12%) v 18/62 (29%); P=0.03) in the MRLN sparing group. Additionally, MRI detectable late atrophy in the superior pharyngeal constrictor (mean thickness: 1.80 v 1.65 mm; P=0.005) and middle pharyngeal constrictor (2.34 v 2.15 mm; P=0.01) was less severe after MRLN sparing radiotherapy. Conclusions MRLN sparing radiotherapy maintained uncompromised efficacy and better long term swallowing function by reducing radiation damage to pharyngeal contractors, supporting its use as a standard of care for non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03346109 .