International multidisciplinary consensus recommendations for the screening and assessment of post-stroke spatial neglect using an online Delphi method

忽视 多学科方法 德尔菲法 代表性启发 医学 风险评估 心理学 德尔菲 梅德林 医学教育 考试(生物学) 应用心理学 心理测量学 护理部 家庭医学 工作(物理) 忠诚 计算机辅助网络访谈 可比性 拉什模型 概化理论
作者
Lindy Joanne Williams,Timothy J. Rich,Peii Chen,Gail A. Eskes,Tobias Loetscher,Jocelyn Kernot,Susan Hillier,Alžbeta Námešná,Mauro Mancuso,Kimberly Hreha,Helena Fordell,Audrey; id_orcid 0000-0003-4075-1215 Bowen
出处
期刊:The University of Manchester - Research Explorer [University of Manchester]
链接
摘要

Design: Online Delphi method with five survey rounds and one virtual meeting to achieve international multidisciplinary recommendations for the screening and assessment of spatial neglect in clinical practice.

Participants: 175 experts with ≥5 publications in spatial neglect were invited.

Main Measures: Surveys were developed from a published review. Working definitions were provided for clarity: screening (as applicable for all stroke survivors), and assessment (conducted if positive screen). Participants rated the importance of screening and assessment of each spatial neglect subtype, and preferences for measurement tools. Consensus was predefined as ≥75% agreement. Participants could also provide explanatory free text responses. After each round, participants received summarised results to inform subsequent rounds. A final meeting focused on assessment items without consensus.

Results: 66 participated in Round 1, representing 15 countries and 6 disciplines; with 29 in the final 5th Round and 9 attended the meeting. There was consensus that: all survivors should be screened for spatial neglect within 2-weeks post stroke; and those screening positive should have a comprehensive assessment of all subtypes of spatial neglect. Several tools reached consensus with shortlists for some subtypes.

Conclusion: This work presents international, multidisciplinary recommendations on screening and assessment, developed by experts from 15 countries and six disciplines; however, attrition across rounds and small consensus meeting (n=9) may limit the representativeness of some tool-specific decisions. Implementing these findings may improve the detection of spatial neglect in clinical practice. Further research exploring psychometrics (validity, reliability, sensitivity, specificity) of shortlisted tools will support a full clinical protocol.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
小蘑菇应助大娃娃采纳,获得30
刚刚
刚刚
毗昙发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
Somui发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
Pepsi完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
怕黑岱周发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
完美世界应助Pluto采纳,获得10
1秒前
heidi完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
mLI应助朴素小馒头采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
CodeCraft应助黑羽快斗采纳,获得10
2秒前
含蓄的保温杯完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
eamon完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
seven发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
Jenna完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
英俊绿蝶关注了科研通微信公众号
3秒前
倾夏唯音发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
怕黑岱周发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
小朋宇完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
万能图书馆应助marry采纳,获得10
4秒前
andy111完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
可爱的函函应助tianxiao采纳,获得10
5秒前
怕黑岱周发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
怕黑岱周发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
怕黑岱周发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
内視鏡的に摘除しえた十二指腸乳頭部腫瘍の2例 660
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Positive Obsession: The Life and Times of Octavia E. Butler 500
Surgical Ergonomic Pilot Study Using a Posture Biofeedback Device in Rhinology: A MultiPhase Quality Improvement Study 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7691236
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9253018
关于积分的说明 19979456
捐赠科研通 7264075
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3290941
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2447281
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2296023