Diagnostic Accuracy of Portable, Handheld Point-of-Care Tests vs Laboratory-Based Bilirubin Quantification in Neonates

医学 奇纳 注意事项 梅德林 荟萃分析 队列研究 系统回顾 科克伦图书馆 指南 数据提取 检测点注意事项 周转时间 急诊医学 医学物理学 内科学 心理干预 病理 法学 精神科 操作系统 计算机科学 政治学
作者
Lauren E H Westenberg,Jasper V. Been,Sten P. Willemsen,Jolande Vis,Andrei N. Tintu,Wichor M. Bramer,Peter H. Dijk,Eric A.P. Steegers,Irwin Reiss,Christian V. Hulzebos
出处
期刊:JAMA Pediatrics [American Medical Association]
卷期号:177 (5): 479-479 被引量:14
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.0059
摘要

Importance Quantification of bilirubin in blood is essential for early diagnosis and timely treatment of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Handheld point-of-care (POC) devices may overcome the current issues with conventional laboratory-based bilirubin (LBB) quantification. Objective To systematically evaluate the reported diagnostic accuracy of POC devices compared with LBB quantification. Data Sources A systematic literature search was conducted in 6 electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, and Google Scholar) up to December 5, 2022. Study Selection Studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis if they had a prospective cohort, retrospective cohort, or cross-sectional design and reported on the comparison between POC device(s) and LBB quantification in neonates aged 0 to 28 days. Point-of-care devices needed the following characteristics: portable, handheld, and able to provide a result within 30 minutes. This study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guideline. Data Extraction and Synthesis Data extraction was performed by 2 independent reviewers into a prespecified, customized form. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. Meta-analysis was performed of multiple Bland-Altman studies using the Tipton and Shuster method for the main outcome. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome was mean difference and limits of agreement in bilirubin levels between POC device and LBB quantification. Secondary outcomes were (1) turnaround time (TAT), (2) blood volumes, and (3) percentage of failed quantifications. Results Ten studies met the inclusion criteria (9 cross-sectional studies and 1 prospective cohort study), representing 3122 neonates. Three studies were considered to have a high risk of bias. The Bilistick was evaluated as the index test in 8 studies and the BiliSpec in 2. A total of 3122 paired measurements showed a pooled mean difference in total bilirubin levels of −14 μmol/L, with pooled 95% CBs of −106 to 78 μmol/L. For the Bilistick, the pooled mean difference was −17 μmol/L (95% CBs, −114 to 80 μmol/L). Point-of-care devices were faster in returning results compared with LBB quantification, whereas blood volume needed was less. The Bilistick was more likely to have a failed quantification compared with LBB. Conclusions and Relevance Despite the advantages that handheld POC devices offer, these findings suggest that the imprecision for measurement of neonatal bilirubin needs improvement to tailor neonatal jaundice management.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
废柴养成计划完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
脑洞疼应助Nicole采纳,获得10
1秒前
林翔翔发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
qiqi完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
fengdengjin完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
gali完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
明良韵应助默默盼海采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
徐亚楠发布了新的文献求助20
2秒前
jty完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
慕青应助cloud采纳,获得10
2秒前
充电宝应助lyx采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
MrD完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
nav发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
微笑千凡发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
传奇3应助Aveline采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
记住星辰发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
小二郎应助piggyming采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
疯狂的翠阳完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
热心友儿发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
花遇和风发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
ARES2完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
DEDEDE完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
8秒前
兴武完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
张国麒完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
Elysia完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
科研的人发布了新的文献求助20
8秒前
hd完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Nine new races of Peronospora manshurica found on soybeans in the Midwest 1000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Eudora Welty and Modern Media 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7773564
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9315645
关于积分的说明 20346500
捐赠科研通 7359234
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3317215
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2465825
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2332323