Impact of systemic imaging surveillance on survival from metastatic uveal melanoma

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommended surveillance imaging intervals for uveal melanoma (UM) based on the risk of distant metastasis. The objective of this research is to evaluate if patients, treated at our tertiary cancer center, who had scans consistent with these guidelines, had improved overall survival (OS). This was a single-center, retrospective study of UM patients, who developed metastatic disease. Patients were grouped into risk-of-metastasis cohorts (low, medium, and high-risk) based on the UM NCCN guidelines v1.2023. The frequency of scans was reported within annual intervals for 5 years within the low-risk cohort and for 10 years within the medium-risk cohort, and within 6-month intervals for the first 5 years and then annually in years 6–10 within the high-risk cohort. Conditional landmark analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between OS and consistency with guidelines. Scan frequency was evaluated against socioeconomic status. Of the 740 UM patients identified (1997–2020), 110 experienced metastasis and comprised our analysis population (20 low-risk; 67 medium-risk; and 23 high-risk). The median time to death (95% confidence interval) from diagnosis of metastasis was similar between the low, medium, and high-risk cohorts at 1.2 (1.0, 2.0), 2.0 (1.7, 2.6), and 1.6 (1.3, 2.3) years, respectively. For each cohort, the OS results were similar between those who followed guidelines vs. not at each annual landmark time. Living in disadvantaged areas did not impact imaging frequency (all P > 0.05). Imaging at intervals outlined by the NCCN guidelines v1.2023 did not impact OS for patients who developed metastatic UM.