Descriptions of Scientific Evidence and Uncertainty of Unproven COVID-19 Therapies in US News: Content Analysis Study

2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19) 2019-20冠状病毒爆发 严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2) 内容(测量理论) 内容分析 心理学 医学 病毒学 数学 社会学 内科学 社会科学 传染病(医学专业) 爆发 数学分析 疾病
作者
Sara Watson,Tyler J. Benning,Alessandro R Marcon,Xuan Zhu,Timothy Caulfield,Richard R. Sharp,Zubin Master
出处
期刊:JMIR infodemiology [JMIR Publications Inc.]
卷期号:4: e51328-e51328 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.2196/51328
摘要

Background Politicization and misinformation or disinformation of unproven COVID-19 therapies have resulted in communication challenges in presenting science to the public, especially in times of heightened public trepidation and uncertainty. Objective This study aims to examine how scientific evidence and uncertainty were portrayed in US news on 3 unproven COVID-19 therapeutics, prior to the development of proven therapeutics and vaccines. Methods We conducted a media analysis of unproven COVID-19 therapeutics in early 2020. A total of 479 discussions of unproven COVID-19 therapeutics (hydroxychloroquine, remdesivir, and convalescent plasma) in traditional and online US news reports from January 1, 2020, to July 30, 2020, were systematically analyzed for theme, scientific evidence, evidence details and limitations, safety, efficacy, and sources of authority. Results The majority of discussions included scientific evidence (n=322, 67%) although only 24% (n=116) of them mentioned publications. “Government” was the most frequently named source of authority for safety and efficacy claims on remdesivir (n=43, 35%) while “expert” claims were mostly mentioned for convalescent plasma (n=22, 38%). Most claims on hydroxychloroquine (n=236, 79%) were offered by a “prominent person,” of which 97% (n=230) were from former US President Trump. Despite the inclusion of scientific evidence, many claims of the safety and efficacy were made by nonexperts. Few news reports expressed scientific uncertainty in discussions of unproven COVID-19 therapeutics as limitations of evidence were infrequently included in the body of news reports (n=125, 26%) and rarely found in headlines (n=2, 2%) or lead paragraphs (n=9, 9%; P<.001). Conclusions These results highlight that while scientific evidence is discussed relatively frequently in news reports, scientific uncertainty is infrequently reported and rarely found in prominent headlines and lead paragraphs.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
科研通AI6应助小小采纳,获得10
刚刚
科研通AI6应助小小采纳,获得10
刚刚
星辰大海应助小小采纳,获得30
刚刚
浮游应助小小采纳,获得10
刚刚
Jasper应助小小采纳,获得50
刚刚
hexy629完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
xinl518发布了新的文献求助20
3秒前
科研通AI6应助科研求助111采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
小马甲应助小鹅采纳,获得10
4秒前
happiness完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
自渡完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
星辰大海应助杀猪匠采纳,获得10
6秒前
鲤鱼新儿发布了新的文献求助50
6秒前
7秒前
Owen应助宝宝烤面包采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
John完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
鱼丸发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
善学以致用应助琳琳采纳,获得10
12秒前
小小发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
yourenpkma123发布了新的文献求助20
13秒前
Cathay发布了新的文献求助30
15秒前
wpy发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
good_lucky完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
Jasper应助程笑笑采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
17秒前
18秒前
康帅傅完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
明天见完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
KirinLee麒麟完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
隐形曼青应助马子婷采纳,获得10
20秒前
st发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
miracle完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Fermented Coffee Market 2000
A Modern Guide to the Economics of Crime 500
PARLOC2001: The update of loss containment data for offshore pipelines 500
Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life 4th Edition 500
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 500
A Manual for the Identification of Plant Seeds and Fruits : Second revised edition 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5272536
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4429759
关于积分的说明 13789897
捐赠科研通 4308272
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2364084
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1359709
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1322750