Descriptions of Scientific Evidence and Uncertainty of Unproven COVID-19 Therapies in US News: Content Analysis Study

2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19) 2019-20冠状病毒爆发 严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2) 内容(测量理论) 内容分析 心理学 医学 病毒学 数学 社会学 内科学 社会科学 传染病(医学专业) 疾病 爆发 数学分析
作者
Sara Watson,Tyler J. Benning,Alessandro R Marcon,Xuan Zhu,Timothy Caulfield,Richard R. Sharp,Zubin Master
出处
期刊:JMIR infodemiology [JMIR Publications Inc.]
卷期号:4: e51328-e51328 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.2196/51328
摘要

Background Politicization and misinformation or disinformation of unproven COVID-19 therapies have resulted in communication challenges in presenting science to the public, especially in times of heightened public trepidation and uncertainty. Objective This study aims to examine how scientific evidence and uncertainty were portrayed in US news on 3 unproven COVID-19 therapeutics, prior to the development of proven therapeutics and vaccines. Methods We conducted a media analysis of unproven COVID-19 therapeutics in early 2020. A total of 479 discussions of unproven COVID-19 therapeutics (hydroxychloroquine, remdesivir, and convalescent plasma) in traditional and online US news reports from January 1, 2020, to July 30, 2020, were systematically analyzed for theme, scientific evidence, evidence details and limitations, safety, efficacy, and sources of authority. Results The majority of discussions included scientific evidence (n=322, 67%) although only 24% (n=116) of them mentioned publications. “Government” was the most frequently named source of authority for safety and efficacy claims on remdesivir (n=43, 35%) while “expert” claims were mostly mentioned for convalescent plasma (n=22, 38%). Most claims on hydroxychloroquine (n=236, 79%) were offered by a “prominent person,” of which 97% (n=230) were from former US President Trump. Despite the inclusion of scientific evidence, many claims of the safety and efficacy were made by nonexperts. Few news reports expressed scientific uncertainty in discussions of unproven COVID-19 therapeutics as limitations of evidence were infrequently included in the body of news reports (n=125, 26%) and rarely found in headlines (n=2, 2%) or lead paragraphs (n=9, 9%; P<.001). Conclusions These results highlight that while scientific evidence is discussed relatively frequently in news reports, scientific uncertainty is infrequently reported and rarely found in prominent headlines and lead paragraphs.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
甜汤蛙完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
小懒发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
YuZhang发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
wyj发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
33Rylee发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
依亦然发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
碥诚完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
隐形曼青应助hyj采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
充电宝应助panbl451245采纳,获得10
4秒前
Hello应助肉脸小鱼采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
小王很幸福完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
情怀应助杨飞采纳,获得10
5秒前
huainiande完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
栩栩发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
REX完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
6秒前
Hazuki完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
天真慕山完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
orixero应助lebangzhanshi采纳,获得10
6秒前
星辰大海应助WTH采纳,获得10
6秒前
潇潇发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
CipherSage应助33Rylee采纳,获得10
7秒前
江芯发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
hsp完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
十三客完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
hsp发布了新的文献求助30
10秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
48V Low-voltage Power Distribution Network (PDN) Architecture Industry Report, 2024 800
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 700
Direct and Iterative Linear System Solvers 500
Plato's Parmenides. A Constructive Reading 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7301793
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8920066
关于积分的说明 18893181
捐赠科研通 6966085
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3211421
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2380467
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2188372