临界关闭压力
医学
气道
麻醉
快速眼动睡眠
睡眠(系统调用)
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停
多导睡眠图
睡眠呼吸暂停
呼吸暂停
眼球运动
眼科
血流动力学
计算机科学
操作系统
作者
Kathleen J. Maddison,Jennifer H. Walsh,Kelly Shepherd,Chrianna Bharat,Bradley K. Lawther,Peter R. Platt,Peter R. Eastwood,David R. Hillman
标识
DOI:10.1213/ane.0000000000004070
摘要
BACKGROUND: The propensities for the upper airway to collapse during anesthesia and sleep are related, although much of our understanding of this relationship has been inferred from clinical observation and indirect measures such as the apnea–hypopnea index. The aim of this study was to use an identical, rigorous, direct measure of upper airway collapsibility (critical closing pressure of the upper airway) under both conditions to allow the magnitude of upper airway collapsibility in each state to be precisely compared. METHODS: Ten subjects (8 men and 2 women; mean ± SD: age, 40.4 ± 12.1 years; body mass index, 28.5 ± 4.0 kg/m 2 ) were studied. Critical closing pressure of the upper airway was measured in each subject on separate days during (1) propofol anesthesia and (2) sleep. RESULTS: Critical closing pressure of the upper airway measurements were obtained in all 10 subjects during nonrapid eye movement sleep and, in 4 of these 10 subjects, also during rapid eye movement sleep. Critical closing pressure of the upper airway during anesthesia was linearly related to critical closing pressure of the upper airway during nonrapid eye movement sleep ( r = 0.64 [95% CI, 0.02–0.91]; n = 10; P = .046) with a similar tendency in rapid eye movement sleep ( r = 0.80 [95% CI, −0.70 to 0.99]; n = 4; P = .200). However, critical closing pressure of the upper airway during anesthesia was systematically greater (indicating increased collapsibility) than during nonrapid eye movement sleep (2.1 ± 2.2 vs −2.0 ± 3.2 cm H 2 O, respectively, n = 10; within-subject mean difference, 4.1 cm H 2 O [95% CI, 2.32–5.87]; P < .001) with a similar tendency during rapid eye movement sleep (1.6 ± 2.4 vs −1.9 ± 4.3 cm H 2 O, respectively, n = 4; unadjusted difference, 3.5 cm H 2 O [95% CI, −0.95 to 7.96]; P = .087). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that the magnitude of upper airway collapsibility during anesthesia and sleep is directly related. However, the upper airway is systematically more collapsible during anesthesia than sleep, suggesting greater vulnerability to upper airway obstruction in the anesthetized state.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI