诊断优势比
医学
荟萃分析
诊断试验中的似然比
子宫内膜癌
内科学
子群分析
优势比
生物标志物
附睾
胃肠病学
曲线下面积
诊断生物标志物
诊断准确性
癌症
肿瘤科
妇科
男科
生物
精子
生物化学
作者
Liman Li,Yuxuan Zhu,Yi Zhong,Tao Su,Xiaoming Fan,Qian Xi,Mingyong Li,Jun Fu,Hong Qi Tan,Shan Liu
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.cca.2018.03.040
摘要
Serum human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) is a potential marker for endometrial cancer (EC), however, the diagnostic value of HE4 for EC remains controversial. In this study, we performed a meta-analysis to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of serum HE4 for EC. Literature reports of the diagnostic accuracy of serum HE4 for EC were systematically identified using online data-bases. The meta-analysis was performed using STATA 12.0, Meta-Disc 1.4, and Review Manager 5.2. A total of 4182 participants and 23 studies were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were 0.65 (95% CI: 0.56–0.73), 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84–0.95), (95% CI: 4.38–12.64), 0.38 (95% CI: 0.31–0.47), 19.46 (95% CI: 11.61–32.62) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.81 to 0.87), respectively. Our overall analysis suggested that HE4 is a useful diagnostic marker for EC. Subgroup analysis indicated that studies with benign disease controls showed higher diagnostic accuracies than those with healthy controls. Serum HE4 may serve as a potential biomarker for EC diagnosis. Due to certain limitations, this conclusion should to be cautiously interpreted.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI