眉间
前额
肉毒毒素
医学
皱纹
随机对照试验
神经毒素
不利影响
透明质酸
外科
皮肤病科
内科学
解剖
老年学
作者
Meghan Dubina,Rebecca Tung,Diana Bolotin,Anne Marie Mahoney,Bailey Tayebi,Maurício Sato,Fabiane Mulinari‐Brenner,Trevor Jones,Dennis P. West,Emily Poon,Michael Nodzenski,Murad Alam
摘要
Summary Background Forehead and glabella rhytides are treated mostly with neurotoxins, although some practitioners prefer the concurrent use of fillers. It has been suggested that combination treatments can result in a better overall improvement. Aims To compare the safety and effectiveness of treatment of forehead and glabellar lines with botulinum toxin A alone versus botulinum toxin A and filler. Methods Split‐face, randomized control trial. Twenty subjects with forehead/glabellar rhytide complex (static and dynamic creases) enrolled. Subjects were randomized and injected with botulinum toxin alone on one side of the forehead/glabella and hyaluronic acid filler followed by botulinum toxin on the other side. Blinded ratings were obtained to assess the effectiveness of treatment for static and dynamic rhytides, respectively, at 2‐week, 6‐week, 3‐month, and 6‐month follow‐up visits. Subjects performed a self‐evaluation at the end of the study. Adverse events were recorded. Results Ratings of both treatments showed comparable efficacy, with 100% of subjects experiencing improvement from baseline regardless of treatment type at weeks 2, 6, and 12. Combination treatment produced longer‐lasting results in dynamic forehead wrinkles, and greater static and dynamic wrinkle reduction in the glabella at week 24. Subject self‐evaluations showed that both treatments were effective, with a nominal preference for combination treatment. Conclusions Glabella and forehead lines can be effectively and safely reduced with neurotoxin alone as well as neurotoxin in combination with fillers. Combination treatment may provide a slightly better cumulative benefit and also increase the persistence of effect.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI