Evaluating the Accuracy of ChatGPT and Google BARD in Fielding Oculoplastic Patient Queries: A Comparative Study on Artificial versus Human Intelligence

可读性 医学 移情 人工智能 外科 医学教育 计算机科学 精神科 程序设计语言
作者
Eman Al-Sharif,Rafaella C. Penteado,Nahia Dib El Jalbout,Nicole Topilow,Marissa K. Shoji,Don O. Kikkawa,Catherine Y. Liu,Bobby S. Korn
出处
期刊:Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
标识
DOI:10.1097/iop.0000000000002567
摘要

Purpose: This study evaluates and compares the accuracy of responses from 2 artificial intelligence platforms to patients’ oculoplastics-related questions. Methods: Questions directed toward oculoplastic surgeons were collected, rephrased, and input independently into ChatGPT-3.5 and BARD chatbots, using the prompt: “As an oculoplastic surgeon, how can I respond to my patient’s question?.” Responses were independently evaluated by 4 experienced oculoplastic specialists as comprehensive, correct but inadequate, mixed correct and incorrect/outdated data, and completely incorrect. Additionally, the empathy level, length, and automated readability index of the responses were assessed. Results: A total of 112 patient questions underwent evaluation. The rates of comprehensive, correct but inadequate, mixed, and completely incorrect answers for ChatGPT were 71.4%, 12.9%, 10.5%, and 5.1%, respectively, compared with 53.1%, 18.3%, 18.1%, and 10.5%, respectively, for BARD. ChatGPT showed more empathy (48.9%) than BARD (13.2%). All graders found that ChatGPT outperformed BARD in question categories of postoperative healing, medical eye conditions, and medications. Categorizing questions by anatomy, ChatGPT excelled in answering lacrimal questions (83.8%), while BARD performed best in the eyelid group (60.4%). ChatGPT’s answers were longer and potentially more challenging to comprehend than BARD’s. Conclusion: This study emphasizes the promising role of artificial intelligence-powered chatbots in oculoplastic patient education and support. With continued development, these chatbots may potentially assist physicians and offer patients accurate information, ultimately contributing to improved patient care while alleviating surgeon burnout. However, it is crucial to highlight that artificial intelligence may be good at answering questions, but physician oversight remains essential to ensure the highest standard of care and address complex medical cases.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
sdavid发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
奥力给应助Zx采纳,获得10
4秒前
小明发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
科里斯皮尔应助杭笑寒采纳,获得10
6秒前
斯文败类应助mmmmmm采纳,获得10
6秒前
执意发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
平淡心锁发布了新的文献求助20
8秒前
温乘云发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
柠檬发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
ColdAsYou完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
不安青牛应助梦想or现实采纳,获得10
11秒前
14秒前
走丢的热气球完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
122发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
16秒前
16秒前
16秒前
17秒前
18秒前
家欣完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
Dsivan发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
李健应助122采纳,获得10
20秒前
orixero应助庾稀采纳,获得10
20秒前
李健的小迷弟应助温乘云采纳,获得10
20秒前
longlonglong完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
今后应助Evol采纳,获得10
21秒前
健忘的芷荷完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
yzr发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
23秒前
23秒前
Logicat发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
阿九应助白张一个脑袋采纳,获得10
24秒前
24秒前
Hao应助积极的爆米花采纳,获得10
24秒前
小马甲应助冷傲的迎南采纳,获得10
24秒前
高分求助中
【本贴是提醒信息,请勿应助】请在求助之前详细阅读求助说明!!!! 20000
One Man Talking: Selected Essays of Shao Xunmei, 1929–1939 1000
The Three Stars Each: The Astrolabes and Related Texts 900
Yuwu Song, Biographical Dictionary of the People's Republic of China 800
Multifunctional Agriculture, A New Paradigm for European Agriculture and Rural Development 600
Challenges, Strategies, and Resiliency in Disaster and Risk Management 500
Bernd Ziesemer - Maos deutscher Topagent: Wie China die Bundesrepublik eroberte 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2481959
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2144460
关于积分的说明 5470120
捐赠科研通 1866929
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 928003
版权声明 563071
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 496455