医学
喉咙痛
不利影响
显著性差异
内科学
胃肠病学
入射(几何)
奥司他韦
麻醉
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)
物理
疾病
传染病(医学专业)
光学
作者
Chaochao Qiu,Fang Cheng,Xinchun Ye,Zhengxing Wu,Hongye Ning,Saiduo Liu,Lianpeng Wu,Shouxin Zhang,Jichan Shi,Xiangao Jiang
标识
DOI:10.3389/fmed.2024.1339368
摘要
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of baloxavir marboxil tablets in the treatment of influenza A. Methods According to a random sequence generated by computer software, 200 patients with confirmed influenza A were divided into a study group and a control group with 100 cases in each group. Group allocation was concealed using sealed envelopes. The study group was treated with oral administration of baloxavir marboxil tablets, 40 mg once. The control group was given oral oseltamivir capsules, 75 mg twice a day, for five consecutive days. The therapeutic effects, symptom disappearance time and adverse drug reactions of the two groups after 5 days of treatment were compared. Results There was no significant difference in the total effective rate between the two groups (99% vs. 98%, p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in fever subsidence time (1.54 ± 0.66 d vs. 1.67 ± 0.71 d, p > 0.05), cough improvement time (2.26 ± 0.91 d vs. 2.30 ± 0.90 d, p > 0.05) and sore throat improvement time (2.06 ± 0.86 d vs. 2.09 ± 0.83 d, p > 0.05) between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse drug reactions between the two groups (8% vs. 13%, p > 0.05). Conclusion Baloxavir marboxil tablets can be effectively used in the treatment of patients with influenza A and have a similar efficacy and safety profile as oseltamivir capsules.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI